6533b81ffe1ef96bd1278763
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Validation of the German version of the Kujala score in patients with patellofemoral instability : a prospective multi-centre study
K. EmmanuelSebastian KopfJohannes M. GiesingerMichael LiebensteinerUrho M. KujalaFlorian DirisamerDietmar Dammerersubject
Joint Instabilitymedicine.medical_specialtyKnee JointpolvetkyselytutkimussijoiltaanmenoMedial patellofemoral ligamentLinguistic validationSeverity of Illness IndexPatellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS)GermanPatellofemoral Joint03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineQuality of lifeCronbach's alphaSurveys and QuestionnairesValidationmedicineHumansOrthopedics and Sports Medicine030222 orthopedicsQuestionnairebusiness.industryKujala scorequestionnairepatellofemoral instabilityDiscriminant validityoireyhtymätkipu030229 sport sciencesGeneral MedicinePatellofemoral instabilityArthralgiaKujala patellofemoral scorelanguage.human_languageArthroscopy and Sports Medicinemedicine.anatomical_structureConvergent validityvalidointiLigaments ArticularOrthopedic surgerylanguagePhysical therapySurgerybusinessdescription
Introduction: The Kujala score is the most frequently used questionnaire for patellofemoral disorders like pain, instability or osteoarthritis. Unfortunately, we are not aware of a validated German version of the Kujala score. The aim of our study was the translation and linguistic validation of the Kujala score in German-speaking patients with patella instability and the assessment of its measurement characteristics. Materials and methods: The German Kujala score was developed in several steps of translation. In addition to healthy controls, the Kujala German was assessed in consecutive patients undergoing reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent patellar dislocations. Pre-op, 6 and 12 months postop the patients completed the Kujala German score, the KOOS, the Lysholm score, a VAS Pain, and the SF-12v2 scores. In addition, there was a Kujala German Score retest preop after a 1-week interval. Results: We found high reliability in terms of internal consistency for the Kujala score (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87). Convergent validity with the KOOS (symptom r = 0.65, pain r = 0.78, ADL r = 0.74, sports/recreation r = 0.84, quality of life r = 0.70), the Lysholm score (r = 0.88) and the SF-12 physical component summary score (r = 0.79) and VAS pain (r = − 0.71) was also very high. Discriminant validity in terms of correlation with the SF-12 mental component summary Score was satisfactory (r = 0.14). Conclusions: In conclusion, the German version of the Kujala score proved to be a reliable and valid instrument in the setting of a typical patellofemoral disease treated with a standard patellofemoral procedure. peerReviewed
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-09-21 |