6533b81ffe1ef96bd127881c

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin in recurrent or previously untreated unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Roberto ValenzaG CannataDi Gregorio CMoschella FGebbiaRestivo GIngria FAntonio TestaNicolo' Gebbia

subject

AdultMaleCancer Researchmedicine.medical_specialtymedicine.drug_classmedicine.medical_treatmentVinblastineVinorelbineGastroenterologyDrug Administration ScheduleVinca alkaloidInternal medicineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsmedicineHumansAgedCisplatinChemotherapybusiness.industryRemission InductionVinorelbineMiddle AgedVinblastineSurgeryRadiation therapyRegimenOncologyHead and Neck NeoplasmsCarcinoma Squamous CellVomitingFemaleCisplatinNeoplasm Recurrence Localmedicine.symptombusinessmedicine.drug

description

Despite considerable progress achieved in the management of head and neck carcinomas (HNC) in the last decade, the prognosis of patients with advanced squamous cell HNC is still dismal. On the basis of the reported good activity of a new vinca alkaloid derivative, i.e., vinorelbine (VNR), we tested the combination of cisplatin and VNR in a series of patients with recurrent or previously untreated unresectable squamous cell HNC. Thirty-five patients with recurrent or previously untreated unresectable squamous cell HNC were treated with a combination of cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 i.v. push on days 1 and 8. This cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. Analysis of response rates was carried out separately for previously untreated patients, and those with recurrent disease after surgery and/or radiotherapy. In the group of 20 patients with recurrent disease the overall response rate was 55% (95% CL 44-66%), with 3 patients (15%) showing a complete response with a mean duration of 6.2+ months and 8 patients showing a partial response with a mean duration of 8.6+ months. In the group of patients with previously untreated unresectable disease, 13 patients (87%, 95% CL 78-96%) had a major objective response with a complete response rate of 27%. This regimen was quite well tolerated, with meyelosuppression and vomiting being the most frequent toxicities. The occurrence of an acute pain syndrome following vinorelbine administration in 4 patients is noteworthy. In conclusion, this combination is active in advanced squamous cell head and neck carcinoma. However, although it may be recommended in recurrent carcinoma, the complete response rate achieved in previously untreated patients is lower than that reported with other more intensive regimens.

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0029094617&partnerID=MN8TOARS