6533b820fe1ef96bd12791d0

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Detection of  9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Amphetamine-Type Stimulants in Oral Fluid Using the Rapid Stat  Point-of-Collection Drug-Testing Device

J. RöhrichR. UrbanS. ZörntleinJürgen Prof. Dr. Becker

subject

DrugMarijuana AbuseSalivaN-Methyl-34-methylenedioxyamphetamineHealth Toxicology and Mutagenesismedia_common.quotation_subjectmedicine.medical_treatmentAmphetamine-Related DisordersPharmacologyToxicologySensitivity and SpecificityGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMethamphetamineAnalytical ChemistryPredictive Value of TestsmedicineHumansEnvironmental ChemistryFalse Positive ReactionsDronabinolSalivaAmphetamineFalse Negative Reactionsmedia_commonImmunoassayChemical Health and SafetyChromatographybiologyChemistryAmphetaminesSolid Phase ExtractionMethamphetaminebiology.organism_classificationSubstance Abuse DetectionAmphetamineCannabinoidCannabisGas chromatography–mass spectrometrymedicine.drugMethadone

description

The Rapid Stat assay, a point-of-collection drug-testing device for detection of amphetamines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates, methadone, and benzodiazepines in oral fluid, was evaluated for cannabis and amphetamine-type stimulants. The Rapid Stat tests (n = 134) were applied by police officers in routine traffic checks. Oral fluid and blood samples were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, amphetamine, methamphetamine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methylenedioxyethylamphetamine, and methylenedioxyamphetamine. The comparison of GC-MS analysis of oral fluid with the Rapid Stat results for cannabis showed a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 87%, and a total confirmation rate of 87%. When compared with serum, the sensitivity of the cannabis assay decreased to 71%, the specificity to 60%, and the total confirmation rate to 66%. These findings were possibly caused by an incorrect reading of the THC test results. Comparison of the Rapid Stat amphetamine assay with GC-MS in oral fluid showed a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 97%, and a total confirmation rate of 97%. Compared with serum, a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 90%, and a total confirmation rate of 92% was found. The amphetamine assay must, therefore, be regarded as satisfactory.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/34.3.155