6533b820fe1ef96bd127a3d8

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Predicting the risk of drug–drug interactions in psychiatric hospitals: a retrospective longitudinal pharmacovigilance study

Harald BinderChristoph HiemkeJan WolffClaus NormannKatharina DomschkeKlaus KaierAnsgar KlimkeGudrun HefnerMichael Marschollek

subject

DrugHospitals PsychiatricLongitudinal studymedicine.medical_specialtymedia_common.quotation_subjectHealth informaticslaw.invention03 medical and health sciencesPharmacovigilance0302 clinical medicinelawRisk FactorsGermanyPharmacovigilanceMedicineHumans1723Drug Interactions030212 general & internal medicine1506Longitudinal StudiesMedical prescriptionPsychiatryhealth informaticsmedia_commonRetrospective StudiesPolypharmacyClinical pharmacologyReceiver operating characteristicbusiness.industryRGeneral MedicinePharmacology and Therapeuticspsychiatry030227 psychiatryPharmaceutical PreparationsMedicineclinical pharmacologybusiness

description

ObjectivesThe aim was to use routine data available at a patient’s admission to the hospital to predict polypharmacy and drug–drug interactions (DDI) and to evaluate the prediction performance with regard to its usefulness to support the efficient management of benefits and risks of drug prescriptions.DesignRetrospective, longitudinal study.SettingWe used data from a large multicentred pharmacovigilance project carried out in eight psychiatric hospitals in Hesse, Germany.ParticipantsInpatient episodes consecutively discharged between 1 October 2017 and 30 September 2018 (year 1) or 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019 (year 2).Outcome measuresThe proportion of rightly classified hospital episodes.MethodsWe used gradient boosting to predict respective outcomes. We tested the performance of our final models in unseen patients from another calendar year and separated the study sites used for training from the study sites used for performance testing.ResultsA total of 53 909 episodes were included in the study. The models’ performance, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic, was ‘excellent’ (0.83) and ‘acceptable’ (0.72) compared with common benchmarks for the prediction of polypharmacy and DDI, respectively. Both models were substantially better than a naive prediction based solely on basic diagnostic grouping.ConclusionThis study has shown that polypharmacy and DDI can be predicted from routine data at patient admission. These predictions could support an efficient management of benefits and risks of hospital prescriptions, for instance by including pharmaceutical supervision early after admission for patients at risk before pharmacological treatment is established.

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045276http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC8043005