6533b820fe1ef96bd127a59b
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Comparison of anterior cingulate vs. insular cortex as targets for real-time fMRI regulation during pain stimulation
Dimitri Van De VilleDimitri Van De VilleMarkus BreimhorstSven HallerKirsten EmmertKirsten EmmertFrank BirkleinT. Bauermannsubject
Ventrolateral prefrontal cortexCognitive NeuroscienceCaudate nucleusStimulationrealtime fMRIInsular cortexddc:616.0757behavioral disciplines and activitieslcsh:RC321-57103 medical and health sciencesBehavioral Neuroscience0302 clinical medicineNeuroimaginganterior insular cortexmedicinecibm-spcreal-time fMRI neurofeedbackpainOriginal Research Articlelcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryAnterior cingulate cortex030304 developmental biologyanterior cingulate cortex (ACC)0303 health sciencesmedicine.diagnostic_testNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychologymedicine.anatomical_structurenervous systeminsular cortexNeurofeedbackPsychologyFunctional magnetic resonance imagingNeuroscience030217 neurology & neurosurgerypsychological phenomena and processesNeurosciencedescription
© 2014 Emmert Breimhorst Bauermann Birklein Van De Ville and Haller. Real time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rt fMRI) neurofeedback allows learning voluntary control over specific brain areas by means of operant conditioning and has been shown to decrease pain perception. To further increase the effect of rt fMRI neurofeedback on pain we directly compared two different target regions of the pain network notably the anterior insular cortex (AIC) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Participants for this prospective study were randomly assigned to two age matched groups of 14 participants each (7 females per group) for AIC and ACC feedback. First a functional localizer using block design heat pain stimulation was performed to define the pain sensitive target region within the AIC or ACC. Second subjects were asked to down regulate the BOLD activation in four neurofeedback runs during identical pain stimulation. Data analysis included task related and functional connectivity analysis. At the behavioral level pain ratings significantly decreased during feedback vs. localizer runs but there was no difference between AIC and ACC groups. Concerning neuroimaging ACC and AIC showed consistent involvement of the caudate nucleus for subjects that learned down regulation (17/28) in both task related and functional connectivity analysis. The functional connectivity toward the caudate nucleus is stronger for the ACC while the AIC is more heavily connected to the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Consequently the ACC and AIC are suitable targets for real time fMRI neurofeedback during pain perception as they both affect the caudate nucleus although functional connectivity indicates that the direct connection seems to be stronger with the ACC. Additionally the caudate an important area involved in pain perception and suppression could be a good rt fMRI target itself. Future studies are needed to identify parameters characterizing successful regulators and to assess the effect of repeated rt fMRI neurofeedback on pain perception.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014-10-09 |