6533b821fe1ef96bd127afdc

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Early-blind individuals show impaired performance in wine odor categorization

Daphnée PouponDominique ValentinFranco LeporeSimona ManescuHervé AbdiJohannes FrasnelliJordi Ballester

subject

MaleSignal Detection PsychologicalTime FactorsWineAudiologyBlindness0302 clinical medicinevinGeneral Neuroscience05 social sciencesdigestive oral and skin physiology[SDV.NEU.SC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive Sciencesfood and beveragesMiddle AgedSmellCategorizationcatégorisation alimentaireAlimentation et NutritionEarly-blindFemalePsychologypsychological phenomena and processesolfactionAdultmedicine.medical_specialtyceciteSensory systemOlfactionOdor categorization050105 experimental psychologyYoung Adult03 medical and health sciencesmedicineHumansFood and Nutrition0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesAgedWineWhite (horse)Blindnessperception des odeursNeurosciencesblindness;early-blind;wine odors;olfaction;odor perception;odor categorizationOlfactory Perceptionmedicine.diseaseOdor perceptionWine odorsOdorWhite WineNeurons and CognitionOdorants[SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

International audience; Blind individuals display superior sensory abilities in other modalities, yet results remain contradictory regarding their performance on olfactory tasks. Using complex ecological olfactory tasks, we evaluated the impact of blindness on olfactory performance. We tested 12 early-blind individuals (M = 49, SD = 13.09) and 12 sighted controls (M = 49, SD = 14.31) who were all blindfolded. Based solely on the wine odors, participants evaluated 24 pairs of wine and determined if both samples belonged to the same category (red wine, white wine, or rosé wine) or not (odor categorization), and if so, whether they were identical or not (odor differentiation). Then, they had to classify 15 different wines (5 red, 5 white and 5 rosé) into red, white, and rosé wines (odor classification). Blind individuals (d': M = 1.3, SD = 1.2) presented lower scores compared to sighted controls (M = 2.2 SD = 0.8; p < .05) in the odor categorization task, but no group difference was observed for the other tasks. For all participants, red wine odors were the easiest to classify (1.8 ± 1.0), followed by white wine odors (0.5 ± 0.6) and finally rosé wine odors (blind and sighted; F[2; 44] = 11.9, p < .001). In summary, early-blind individuals had a harder time to categorize wine odors. This could be explained by a different construction of internal reference categories for wine in early-blind individuals. Finally, this research is in line with the notion of the absence of higher olfactory sensitivity in blind individuals.

10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.08.012http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/443647