6533b821fe1ef96bd127b77c

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Traditional versus functional strength training: effects on muscle strength and power in the elderly.

Sigmund A. AnderssenMonica Klungland TorstveitHilde Lohne-seiler

subject

MaleFunctional trainingmedicine.medical_specialtyhigh velocityStrength trainingHigh velocityPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationseniorsVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Sports medicine: 850::Exercise techniques: 851Surveys and QuestionnairesmedicineHumansForce platformMuscle StrengthMuscle SkeletalMathematicsAgedAged 80 and overRehabilitationResistance Trainingweight trainingPower (physics)Muscle strengthPhysical therapyFemaleGeriatrics and GerontologyGerontologyforce

description

Published versiom of an article in the journal:Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. Also available from Human Kinetics: http://http://journals.humankinetics.com/japa-back-issues/japa-volume-21-issue-1-january/traditional-versus-functional-strength-training-effects-on-muscle-strength-and-power-in-the-elderly The aim was to determine whether strength training with machines vs. functional strength training at 80% of one-repetition maximum improves muscle strength and power among the elderly. Sixty-three subjects (69.9 +/- 4.1 yr) were randomized to a high-power strength group (HPSG), a functional strength group (FSG), or a nonrandomized control group (CG). Data were collected using a force platform and linear encoder. The training dose was 2 times/wk, 3 sets x 8 reps, for 11 wk. There were no differences in effect between HPSG and FSG concerning sit-to-stand power, box-lift power, and bench-press maximum force. Leg-press maximum force improved in HPSG (19.8%) and FSG (19.7%) compared with CG (4.3%; p = .026). Bench-press power improved in HPSG (25.1%) compared with FSG (0.5%, p = .02) and CG (2%, p = .04). Except for bench-press power there were no differences in the effect of the training interventions on functional power and maximal body

10.1123/japa.21.1.51https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22832419