6533b821fe1ef96bd127b855
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Screening for DSM-5 Somatic Symptom Disorder: Diagnostic Accuracy of Self-Report Measures Within a Population Sample.
Kristina KlausRicarda MewesElmar BrählerWinfried RiefNikola StenzelJohannes A. C. Lafertonsubject
AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentSomatic symptom disorderSensitivity and SpecificityDSM-503 medical and health sciencesYoung Adult0302 clinical medicineSelf-report studyInternal medicinemedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineLongitudinal StudiesYoung adultPsychiatrySomatoform DisordersApplied PsychologyAgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReceiver operating characteristicbusiness.industryArea under the curveMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseConfidence intervalPatient Health QuestionnaireDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersPsychiatry and Mental healthMedically Unexplained SymptomsFemaleSelf Reportbusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgerydescription
OBJECTIVE The new DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder was introduced to improve the diagnosis of persons experiencing what used to be called somatoform disorders. So far, it is unclear whether existing self-report measures are useful to detect the new somatic symptom disorder. This study investigates the diagnostic accuracy of three self-report questionnaires that measure somatic complaints (15 item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-15]) and psychological features (7-item Whiteley Index [WI-7]; Scale for Assessing Illness Behavior [SAIB]), in detecting somatic symptom disorder. METHODS A nationally representative general population survey was performed resulting in 250 participants (minimum age = 14 years. 12.8% participation rate). Assessment took place at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Individual and combined diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-15, WI-7, and SAIB in detecting somatic symptom disorder was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic. RESULTS Diagnostic accuracy was adequate to good for each individual questionnaire (PHQ-15: AUC = 0.79, p < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73-0.85; WI-7: AUC = 0.76, p < .001, 95% CI = 0.69-0.83; SAIB: AUC = 0.77, p < .001, 95% CI = 0.71-0.83). Combining the PHQ-15 and the WI-7 slightly improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.82, p < .001, 95% CI = 0.77-0.88), as did the combination of all three questionnaires (AUC = 0.85, p < .001, 95% CI = 0.79-0.90). CONCLUSIONS The PHQ-15, WI-7, and SAIB are useful screening instruments to detect persons at risk for somatic symptom disorder, and a combination of these three instruments slightly improves diagnostic accuracy. Their use in routine care will lead to improved detection rates.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-11-01 | Psychosomatic medicine |