6533b822fe1ef96bd127cf38
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Isotropic extragalactic flux from dark matter annihilations: lessons from interacting dark matter scenarios
ÁNgeles MolinéÁNgeles MolinéCarlton M. BaughCéline BœhmCéline BœhmJ. A. SchewtschenkoSergio Palomares-ruizsubject
PhysicsAnnihilationCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)010308 nuclear & particles physicsAstrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical PhenomenaIsotropyDark matterFluxFOS: Physical sciencesAstronomy and AstrophysicsLambda-CDM modelCosmic rayAstrophysicsAstrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics01 natural sciencesSpectral line[PHYS.ASTR.CO]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph]/Cosmology and Extra-Galactic Astrophysics [astro-ph.CO]High Energy Physics - PhenomenologyHigh Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)0103 physical sciencesNeutrino010303 astronomy & astrophysicsAstrophysics::Galaxy AstrophysicsAstrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysicsdescription
The extragalactic gamma-ray and neutrino emission may have a contribution from dark matter (DM) annihilations. In the case of discrepancies between observations and standard predictions, one could infer the DM pair annihilation cross section into cosmic rays by studying the shape of the energy spectrum. So far all analyses of the extragalactic DM signal have assumed the standard cosmological model (LambdaCDM) as the underlying theory. However, there are alternative DM scenarios where the number of low-mass objects is significantly suppressed. Therefore the characteristics of the gamma-ray and neutrino emission in these models may differ from LambdaCDM as a result. Here we show that the extragalactic isotropic signal in these alternative models has a similar energy dependence to that in LambdaCDM, but the overall normalisation is reduced. The similarities between the energy spectra combined with the flux suppression could lead one to misinterpret possible evidence for models beyond LambdaCDM as being due to CDM particles annihilating with a much weaker cross section than expected.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-08-30 |