6533b822fe1ef96bd127d88f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Risk of classic Kaposi sarcoma with exposures to plants and soils in Sicily

Barry I. GraubardLiliana PreissLesley A. AndersonMatt AirolaJames J. GoedertNino RomanoAngelo MessinaColleen PelserGiuseppe CalamusaCarmela LauriaCarmelo DazziAnna Maria PernaCamille C. MadsenCamille C. Madsen

subject

Cancer ResearchPathologymedicine.medical_specialtyClassic Kaposi Sarcomabusiness.industryEpidemiologyvirus diseasesfood and beveragesPhysiologymedicine.diseaselcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensSettore MED/42 - Igiene Generale E Applicatalcsh:RC254-282lcsh:Infectious and parasitic diseasesInfectious DiseasesOncologySoil watermedicinelcsh:RC109-216SarcomabusinessHERPESVIRIDAE KAPOSI SARCOMA ITALY ECOLOGY PLANTS NATURAL PRODUCTS SOILSResearch Article

description

Abstract Background Ecologic and in vitro studies suggest that exposures to plants or soil may influence risk of Kaposi sarcoma (KS). Methods In a population-based study of Sicily, we analyzed data on contact with 20 plants and residential exposure to 17 soils reported by 122 classic KS cases and 840 sex- and age-matched controls. With 88 KS-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) seropositive controls as the referent group, novel correlates of KS risk were sought, along with factors distinguishing seronegatives, in multinomial logistic regression models that included matching variables and known KS cofactors - smoking, cortisone use, and diabetes history. All plants were summed for cumulative exposure. Factor and cluster analyses were used to obtain scores and groups, respectively. Individual plants and soils in three levels of exposure with Ptrend ≤ 0.15 were retained in a backward elimination regression model. Results Adjusted for known cofactors, KS was not related to cumulative exposures to 20 plants [per quartile adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 - 1.25, Ptrend = 0.87], nor was it related to any factor scores or cluster of plants (P = 0.11 to 0.81). In the elimination regression model, KS risk was associated with five plants (Ptrend = 0.02 to 0.10) and with residential exposure to six soils (Ptrend = 0.01 to 0.13), including three soils (eutric regosol, chromic/pellic vertisol) used to cultivate durum wheat. None of the KS-associated plants and only one soil was also associated with KSHV serostatus. Diabetes was associated with KSHV seronegativity (ORadj 4.69, 95% CI 1.97 - 11.17), but the plant and soil associations had little effect on previous findings that KS risk was elevated for diabetics (ORadj 7.47, 95% CI 3.04 - 18.35) and lower for current and former smokers (ORadj 0.26 and 0.47, respectively, Ptrend = 0.05). Conclusions KS risk was associated with exposure to a few plants and soils, but these may merely be due to chance. Study of the effects of durum wheat, which was previously associated with cKS, may be warranted.

10.1186/1750-9378-5-23http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-5-23