6533b823fe1ef96bd127e1c7
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Implicitly measured aggressiveness self-concepts in women with borderline personality disorder as assessed by an Implicit Association Test.
Erik BaumannCord BeneckeAlexander F. SchmidtCarsten SpitzerLena Jelineksubject
Adult050103 clinical psychologymedia_common.quotation_subjectPoison controlExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyAnger03 medical and health sciencesYoung Adult0302 clinical medicineArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)Borderline Personality DisorderGermanymental disordersInjury preventionmedicineHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesGeneralizability theoryBorderline personality disordermedia_commonAggression05 social sciencesImplicit-association testHuman factors and ergonomicsmedicine.diseaseSelf Concept030227 psychiatryAggressionPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyCase-Control StudiesFemaleSelf Reportmedicine.symptomPsychologyClinical psychologydescription
Abstract Background Aggressiveness resulting from inappropriately intense anger plays a major role in borderline personality disorder (BPD) and research using self-report measures has consistently found elevated levels of aggression in this condition. However, while self-report assesses explicit dimensions of the self-concept, it cannot elucidate implicit processes that are at least equally important as they guide the perceptions of the self and influence behavioral responses. The present study aimed to extend the research on aggressiveness self-concepts in BPD utilizing an indirect latency-based measure. Methods Twenty-nine female inpatients with BPD and 21 healthy women were assessed with an aggressiveness self-concept Implicit Association Test (Agg-IAT) using reaction time measurements to determine the relative strengths of associations between the self vs. others and aggression vs. peacefulness. Additionally, participants completed self-report questionnaires capturing aggressiveness and BPD symptoms. Results Women with BPD had a significantly more aggressive self-concept as indicated by the Agg-IAT than the control group. Moreover, they rated themselves significantly more aggressive on all dimensions than the controls. As expected, correlations between the Agg-IAT and the self-reported aggressiveness dimensions were low (mean r = -.31). Limitations The modest sample size and the disregard of a clinical control group limit the generalizability and specificity of our findings. Conclusions This study extends prior findings on aggression in BPD in that women with BPD do not only explicitly conceive themselves as more aggressive, but also exhibit implicitly more aggressive self-concepts than healthy controls. Because implicit and explicit self-related operations are related, but distinct processes, our results may hold clinical and therapeutic implications.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-03-01 | Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry |