6533b823fe1ef96bd127e2da

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 3.0-T MR study.

Romaric LoffroyJean-michel PetitPatrick HillonBruno VergèsGuiu BorisSerge AhoPierre-henri LefevreSylvain FavelierDavid MassonViolaine CapitanDenis KrauséJean-pierre Cercueil

subject

MaleCirrhosisMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMESH : Fatty Liver[SDV.IB.IMA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/ImagingMESH : AgedMESH : Prospective Studies030218 nuclear medicine & medical imagingMESH: Linear Models0302 clinical medicineNuclear magnetic resonanceMESH: Aged 80 and overMESH : Diabetes Mellitus Type 2Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseMESH : Linear ModelsNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseMESH : FemaleProspective StudiesMESH: Fatty LiverIntravoxel incoherent motion[ SDV.IB.IMA ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/ImagingAged 80 and overMESH: AgedMESH: Statistics NonparametricMESH: Middle Aged[ INFO.INFO-IM ] Computer Science [cs]/Medical ImagingFatty liverMiddle AgedMESH : AdultMESH : Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging3. Good health030220 oncology & carcinogenesisPotential confounderFemaleRadiologyMESH: Diabetes Mellitus Type 2Adultmedicine.medical_specialtyMESH : MaleMESH: Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingStatistics Nonparametric03 medical and health sciencesmedicine[INFO.INFO-IM]Computer Science [cs]/Medical ImagingHumansRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingMESH : Middle AgedMESH : Aged 80 and overMESH : Statistics NonparametricAgedMESH: Humansbusiness.industryMESH: Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMESH : HumansMESH: Biological MarkersMESH: Adultmedicine.diseaseMr imagingMESH: MaleMESH: Prospective StudiesFatty LiverMESH : Biological MarkersDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiabetes Mellitus Type 2Linear ModelsMESH : Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopySteatosisbusinessMESH: FemaleBiomarkersDiffusion MRI

description

International audience; PURPOSE: To compare pure molecular diffusion, D, perfusion-related diffusion, D*, and perfusion fraction, f, determined from diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the basis of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without liver steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Between December 2009 and September 2011, 108 patients with type 2 diabetes (51 men, 57 women; mean age, 50 years) underwent 3.0-T single-voxel point-resolved proton MR spectroscopy of the liver (segment VII) to calculate the liver fat fraction from water (4.76 ppm) and methylene (1.33 ppm) peaks, corrected for T1 and T2 decay. Steatosis was defined as a liver fat fraction of at least 5.56%. DW imaging was performed by using a single-shot echo-planar sequence with 11 b values (0, 5, 15, 25, 35, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 sec/mm2). Liver D, D*, and f were measured and compared in patients with and patients without steatosis (Mann-Whitney test). RESULTS: The mean liver fat fraction was 7.8% (standard deviation, 9%; range, 0.99%-45%). Forty patients had liver steatosis. D was significantly lower in steatotic compared with nonsteatotic livers (mean, 1.03×10(-3) mm2/sec±0.23 [standard deviation] vs 1.24×10(-3) mm2/sec±0.15, respectively; P<.0001), as was D* (mean, 72.2×10(-3) mm2/sec±61.4 vs 110.6×10(-3) mm2/sec±79; P=.0025). However, f was significantly higher in steatotic compared with nonsteatotic livers (mean, 33.8%±9.4 vs 26.9%±8.8; P=.0003). CONCLUSION: D is significantly decreased in steatosis. The reduction in D* reflects decreased liver parenchymal perfusion in steatosis. Therefore, steatosis can affect diffusion parameters obtained with IVIM.

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00937162