6533b823fe1ef96bd127f675

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique

Manuel PereaJoana Acha

subject

ConsonantDissociation (neuropsychology)media_common.quotation_subjectSpeech recognitionDecision MakingExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyCognitionArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)VowelPerceptionTask Performance and AnalysisReaction TimeDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyLexical decision taskHumansStudentsmedia_commonAnalysis of VariancePsycholinguisticsRecognition PsychologyCognitionGeneral MedicineLinguisticsSpainVisual PerceptionCuesPsychologyPerceptual MaskingPriming (psychology)Photic StimulationCoding (social sciences)

description

Recently, a number of input coding schemes (e.g., SOLAR model, SERIOL model, open-bigram model, overlap model) have been proposed that capture the transposed-letter priming effect (i.e., faster response times for jugde-JUDGE than for jupte-JUDGE). In their current version, these coding schemes do not assume any processing differences between vowels and consonants. However, in a lexical decision task, Perea and Lupker (2004, JML; Lupker, Perea, & Davis, 2008, L&CP) reported that transposed-letter priming effects occurred for consonant transpositions but not for vowel transpositions. This finding poses a challenge for these recently proposed coding schemes. Here, we report four masked priming experiments that examine whether this consonant/vowel dissociation in transposed-letter priming is task-specific. In Experiment 1, we used a lexical decision task and found a transposed-letter priming effect only for consonant transpositions. In Experiments 2-4, we employed a same-different task - a task which taps early perceptual processes - and found a robust transposed-letter priming effect that did not interact with consonant/vowel status. We examine the implications of these findings for the front-end of the models of visual word recognition.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001