6533b823fe1ef96bd127f6f4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Factors influencing adjustment to remote work: Employees’ initial responses to the covid-19 pandemic

Ward Van ZoonenMatti VartiainenAnu SivunenKaisa HenttonenThomas OlssonKirsimarja BlomqvistAnnina Ropponen

subject

Health Toxicology and Mutagenesismedia_common.quotation_subjectApplied psychologyCOVID-19 pandemicSample (statistics)Interpersonal communicationpandemiatArticlelaw.inventionwork adjustmentlawtyöntekijät0502 economics and businessmedicineHumansetätyöQuality (business)työelämäSocial isolationWorkplacesisäinen viestintäPandemicsmedia_commonsopeutuminenOrganizationsComputingMilieux_THECOMPUTINGPROFESSIONSARS-CoV-205 social sciencesRcontextual factorsPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthCOVID-19113 Computer and information sciencesstructural factorsviestintätekniikka3142 Public health care science environmental and occupational healthWork (electrical)poikkeusolotInformation and Communications Technologyremote workCLARITYMedicineOrganizational communication050211 marketingrelational factorsmedicine.symptomPsychology050203 business & management

description

The COVID-19 crisis has disrupted when, where, and how employees work. Drawing on a sample of 5452 Finnish employees, this study explores the factors associated with employees’ abrupt adjustment to remote work. Specifically, this study examines structural factors (i.e., work independence and the clarity of job criteria), relational factors (i.e., interpersonal trust and social isolation), contextual factors of work (i.e., change in work location and perceived disruption), and communication dynamics (i.e., organizational communication quality and communication technology use (CTU)) as mechanisms underlying adjustment to remote work. The findings demonstrate that structural and contextual factors are important predictors of adjustment and that these relationships are moderated by communication quality and CTU. Contrary to previous research, trust in peers and supervisors does not support adjustment to remote work. We discuss the implications of these findings for practice during and beyond times of crisis. publishedVersion Peer reviewed

10.3390/ijerph18136966https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136966