6533b824fe1ef96bd128018d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Global trends in a fragile context : public–nonpublic collaboration, service delivery and social innovation
Aleksandar Bozicsubject
Civil societySociology and Political ScienceService delivery frameworkSocial servicesEconomics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)Context (language use)Social WelfareManagement Monitoring Policy and LawDevelopmentPublic administrationPolitical science0502 economics and business050602 political science & public administrationInstitutional theoryInnovationDevelopment cooperationVDP::Sociology: 220business.industry05 social sciencesPublic sectorPublic institutionNew institutionalismCollaborationVDP::Sosiologi: 2200506 political scienceLocal welfare networksCivil Society OrganizationsPost-conflict reconstructionBusiness Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)businessInnovation in the public sector050203 business & managementdescription
PurposeThis study aims to enhance the understanding of the nature of collaboration between public and nonpublic actors in delivering social services and achieving social innovation in a fragile context, with an emphasis on the role of civil society organisations (CSOs). The paper focuses on Bosnia and Herzegovina, a Southeastern European country which has faced a turbulent post-conflict transition and experienced challenges in its social welfare policy and practice.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses institutional theory, particularly new institutionalism and institutional networking, as a lens through which to understand public and nonpublic collaboration and social innovation within a fragile context. This study adopts a sequential mixed-method approach. Data were derived from 15 semi-structured interviews with representatives from local CSOs, international donors and public institutions, as well as a survey of 120 CSO representatives.FindingsThe collaboration and social innovation in a fragile welfare context have been initiated primarily by nonpublic actors and developed within the triple context of relations between public, civil and foreign donors’ organisations. In such a context, coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphisms act as leading drivers, but also as potential barriers of public–nonpublic collaboration and social innovation. They are triggered by influences from multiple actors, challenging power relations and external pressures on local CSOs.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to the growing research interest in the role of nonpublic actors in the provision of public services and public social innovation, but examines these issues from the perspective of a fragile context, which has thus far been overlooked in the literature.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-11-02 |