6533b824fe1ef96bd12801d5
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Effects of Easy-to-Use Protein-Rich Energy Bar on Energy Balance, Physical Activity and Performance during 8 Days of Sustained Physical Exertion
Klaas R. WesterterpHannu KinnunenMustafa AtalayKeijo HäkkinenMinna TanskanenHeikki KyröläinenArja Uusitalosubject
MaleAnatomy and PhysiologyBioenergeticsHungerEnergy balancelcsh:MedicineBiochemistryBody Mass Index0302 clinical medicineSurveys and Questionnairesenergy expenditurelcsh:ScienceRespiratory Tract InfectionsProtein MetabolismPsychiatryMultidisciplinaryChemistryenergiankulutusMental HealthAdipose TissueFood FortifiedMedicineDietary ProteinsResearch Articlemedicine.medical_specialtyPhysical Exertion030209 endocrinology & metabolismYoung Adult03 medical and health sciencesAnimal scienceenergian saantiInternal medicineHand strengthmedicineHumansExertionSports and Exercise MedicineBiologyNutritionBalance (ability)varusmiesMood DisordersDrinking Waterlcsh:R030229 sport sciences3141 Health care sciencesotaväkiAffectMetabolismenergiansaantiEndocrinologyBasal metabolic ratelcsh:QFluid PhysiologyPhysiological ProcessesEnergy MetabolismEnergy Intakeyoug maleBody mass indexBar (unit)description
Background Previous military studies have shown an energy deficit during a strenuous field training course (TC). This study aimed to determine the effects of energy bar supplementation on energy balance, physical activity (PA), physical performance and well-being and to evaluate ad libitum fluid intake during wintertime 8-day strenuous TC. Methods Twenty-six men (age 20±1 yr.) were randomly divided into two groups: The control group (n = 12) had traditional field rations and the experimental (Ebar) group (n = 14) field rations plus energy bars of 4.1 MJ•day−1. Energy (EI) and water intake was recorded. Fat-free mass and water loss were measured with deuterium dilution and elimination, respectively. The energy expenditure was calculated using the intake/balance method and energy availability as (EI/estimated basal metabolic rate). PA was monitored using an accelerometer. Physical performance was measured and questionnaires of upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), hunger and mood state were recorded before, during and after TC. Results Ebar had a higher EI and energy availability than the controls. However, decreases in body mass and fat mass were similar in both groups representing an energy deficit. No differences were observed between the groups in PA, water balance, URTI symptoms and changes in physical performance and fat-free mass. Ebar felt less hunger after TC than the controls and they had improved positive mood state during the latter part of TC while controls did not. Water deficit associated to higher PA. Furthermore, URTI symptoms and negative mood state associated negatively with energy availability and PA. Conclusion An easy-to-use protein-rich energy bars did not prevent energy deficit nor influence PA during an 8-day TC. The high content of protein in the bars might have induced satiation decreasing energy intake from field rations. PA and energy intake seems to be primarily affected by other factors than energy supplementation such as mood state.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2012-10-18 |