6533b824fe1ef96bd1280c83

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Predicting mortality with cardiac troponins: recent insights from meta-analyses.

Gianfranco CervellinGiuseppe LippiFabian Sanchis-gomar

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyAcute coronary syndromeClinical BiochemistryPopulationMedicine (miscellaneous)Disease030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyCoronary artery disease03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinedeath; mortality; prediction; troponinTroponin complexMeta-Analysis as TopicTroponin TInternal medicinedeathTroponin ImedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineAcute Coronary Syndromeeducationeducation.field_of_studybiologybusiness.industrytroponinHealth PolicyBiochemistry (medical)Troponin IPublic Health Environmental and Occupational Healthpredictionmedicine.diseasePrognosisTroponinmortalityHeart failurebiology.proteinCardiologybusiness

description

Abstract The introduction of cardiac troponin (cTn) testing in clinical practice has been one of the most important breakthroughs that have occurred in the recent history of laboratory medicine. Although it is now uncontestable that cTn values are essential for diagnosing acute coronary syndrome (ACS), solid evidence is also emerging that assessment of either cardiac troponin I (cTnI) or T (cTnT) may provide valuable prognostic information in the general healthy population, as well as in patients with a vast array of cardiac and extra-cardiac diseases. We have hence performed a critical review of the scientific literature for identifying meta-analyses which have investigated the potential contribution of cTns in predicting the risk of death in health and disease. According to the articles identified with our research, we can conclude that increased cTn values may be considered independent risk factors for all-cause mortality in the general population, as well as in patients with ACS, in those undergoing revascularization procedures, or with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Measurement of cTn may then be helpful for stratifying the mortality risk in non-cardiac hospitalized patients, in those with critical illness or sepsis, syncope, stroke, acute aortic dissection, pulmonary diseases, brain injury, renal failure, vascular and non-cardiac surgery. Although this evidence has notable clinical implications, the cost-effectiveness of population screening with high-sensitivity (hs) cTn immunoassays has not been proven so far.

10.1515/dx-2019-0061https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31622246