6533b824fe1ef96bd1280cdf

RESEARCH PRODUCT

LTSER platforms as a place-based transdisciplinary research infrastructure: learning landscape approach through evaluation

Jessica SchäckermannNoa AvniTaras YamelynetsJosé Muñoz-rojasPer AngelstamBruno J. EnsMariia FedoriakFátima CruzNatalie StryametsUlrike TappeinerVincent BretagnolleFrans SijtsmaMihai AdamescuGiovanna FlaimAndrea Stocker-kissRicardo Díaz-delgadoSimone GingrichPedro BejaPedro BejaHeikki SetäläSergey MedinetsIryna ZyablikovaGaëlle TallecMaija TakaMarine ElbakidzeMiri Lavi-neemanViesturs MelecisPeter BezákMichael MantonJohan Törnblom

subject

0106 biological sciencesLANDLearning through evaluationSocial-ecological systemGeography Planning and DevelopmentCONSERVATIONStakeholder engagementECOSYSTEM SERVICES010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesStakeholder engagementEcosystem servicesNormative model of decision-makingSettore BIO/07 - ECOLOGIA11. SustainabilityMANAGEMENTSOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMSBIOSPHERE RESERVESTransdisciplinary researchNature and Landscape ConservationSustainable developmentEcologybusiness.industry010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyEnvironmental resource managementSCIENCE15. Life on landFORESTSocial–ecological systemEuropeGeographySocial system1181 Ecology evolutionary biology[SDE]Environmental SciencesSustainabilityLandscape approachBIODIVERSITYSCALESLandscape ecologybusinessDiscipline

description

Context: Place-based transdisciplinary research involves multiple academic disciplines and non-academic actors. Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) platform is one concept with ~ 80 initiatives globally. Objectives: As an exercise in learning through evaluation we audited (1) the siting, construction and maintenance of individual LTSER platforms, and (2) them as a distributed infrastructure for place-based transdisciplinary research with focus on the European continent. Methods: First, we defined a normative model for ideal performance at both platform and network levels. Second, four surveys were sent out to the 67 self-reported LTSER platforms officially listed at the end of 2016. Third, with a focus on the network level, we analyzed the spatial distribution of both long-term ecological monitoring sites within LTSER platforms, and LTSER platforms across the European continent. Fourth, narrative biographies of 18 platforms in different stages of development were analyzed. Results: While the siting ofLTSER platforms represented biogeographical regions well, variations in land use history and democratic governance were not well represented. Platform construction was based on 2.1 ecological monitoring sites, with 72% ecosystem and 28% social system research. Maintenance of a platform required three to five staff members, focused mostly on ecosystem research, was based mainly on national funding, and had 1–2 years of future funding secured. Networking with other landscape approach concepts was common. Conclusions: Individually, and as a network, LTSER platforms have good potential for transdisciplinary knowledge production and learning about sustainability challenges. To improve the range of variation of Pan-European social–ecological systems we encourage interfacing with other landscape approach concepts. Peer reviewed

10.1007/s10980-018-0737-6http://hdl.handle.net/10449/52510