6533b824fe1ef96bd128141a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparison between anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cancer patients-A quality of life analysis

Fei LiuXiangping CaiJuanfang ZhuYan XiaoHaibin WangJing Wang

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyShouldersOdontologíaFree flapFree Tissue FlapsSurgical FlapsPectoralis MusclesYoung AdultQuality of lifeSurveys and QuestionnairesmedicineHumansMedical historySurgical FlapsGeneral DentistryAgedRetrospective Studiesbusiness.industryCancerRetrospective cohort studyPedicled FlapMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery Proceduresmedicine.disease:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Ciencias de la saludSurgeryOtorhinolaryngologyThighUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASQuality of LifeSurgeryFemaleMouth NeoplasmsResearch-ArticleOral SurgerybusinessPerforator Flap

description

The aim of this study was to compare the differences between anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps (ALTFF) and pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) for reconstruction in oral cancer patients. Method and Patients: who received free flap or PMMF reconstruction after ablation surgeries were eligible for the current study. The patients' demographic data, medical history, and quality of life scores(Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36) and the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaires were collected. Results: 81 of 118 questionnaires were returned (68.64%). There was signi.cant differences between two groups in the gender (P<0.005). Patients reconstructed with ALTFF had better appearance domains and better shoulders domains, in addition to better role emotion domains. Conclusions: Using either PMMF or ALTFF for reconstruction of oral defects after cancer resection signi.cantly in.uences a patient's quality of life. Data from this study provide useful information for physicians and patients during their discussion of reconstruction modalities for oral cancers.

http://hdl.handle.net/10550/36836