6533b824fe1ef96bd1281456
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Carga de comorbilidad y beneficio de la revascularización en ancianos con síndrome coronario agudo
Manuel Martínez-sellésEduardo NúñezGonzalo Luis Alonso SalinasNuria Vicente-ibarraFrancisco MarínPablo Díez-villanuevaSergio RaposeirasJosé María García AcuñaAlbert Ariza-soléJuan SanchisJuan M. Ruiz-nodarPedro RigueiroJosé A. BarrabésF FormigaAlfredo BardajíAlberto CorderoJulio NúñezEmad Abu-assisubject
medicine.medical_specialtyAcute coronary syndromeAnemiamedicine.medical_treatmentEnfermedad cardiovascularAncianoComorbidity030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyCardiologíaRevascularization03 medical and health sciencesPercutaneous Coronary Intervention0302 clinical medicineDiabetes mellitusInternal medicinemedicineHumansSíndrome coronario agudoRegistriesAcute Coronary SyndromePropensity ScoreStrokeAgedRetrospective Studiesbusiness.industryRetrospective cohort studyGeneral Medicinemedicine.diseaseComorbidityTreatment OutcomeRevascularización miocárdicaPropensity score matchingCardiologybusinessdescription
Introduction and objectives: To evaluate the interaction between comorbidity burden and the benefits of in-hospital revascularization in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). Methods: This retrospective study included 7211 patients aged ≥ 70 years from 11 Spanish NSTEACS registries. Six comorbidities were evaluated: diabetes, peripheral artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, renal failure, and anemia. A propensity score was estimated to enable an adjusted comparison of in-hospital revascularization and conservative management. The end point was 1-year all-cause mortality. Results: In total, 1090 patients (15%) died. The in-hospital revascularization rate was 60%. Revascularization was associated with lower 1-year mortality; the strength of the association was unchanged by the addition of comorbidities to the model (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.53-0.69; P=.0001). However, the effects of revascularization were attenuated in patients with renal failure, peripheral artery disease, and chronic pulmonary disease (P for interaction=.004, .007, and .03, respectively) but were not modified by diabetes, anemia, and previous stroke (P=.74, .51, and .28, respectively). Revascularization benefits gradually decreased as the number of comorbidities increased (from a HR of 0.48 [95%CI, 0.39-0.61] with 0 comorbidities to 0.83 [95%CI, 0.62-1.12] with ≥ 5 comorbidities; omnibus P=.016). The results were similar for the propensity score model. The same findings were obtained when invasive management was considered the exposure variable. Conclusions: In-hospital revascularization improves 1-year mortality regardless of comorbidities in elderly patients with NSTEACS. However, the revascularization benefit is progressively reduced with an increased comorbidity burden. Renal failure, peripheral artery disease, and chronic lung disease were the comorbidities with the most detrimental effects on revascularization benefits. Sin financiación No data JCR 2021 0.385 SJR (2021) Q3, 1499/2489 Medicine (miscellaneous) No data IDR 2021 UEM
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-09-01 |