6533b824fe1ef96bd1281569

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The Influence of Friction on Design of the Type of Bracket and Its Relation to OHRQoL in Patients Who Use Multi-Bracket Appliances: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Daniele GarcovichAdriana González-sáezLaura Antonio-zancajoMaría MeloJavier MonteroAlfonso Alvarado-lorenzoAlberto Albaladejo

subject

Salud bucalFrictionOrthodontic BracketsVisual analogue scaleInvestigación médicaDentistryOdontologíaOral healthArticlelaw.inventionsymbols.namesakeorthodontics; pain; quality of life; low-friction brackets; oral healthQuality of lifeRandomized controlled triallawMaterials TestingOrthodontic WiresHumansOrthodontic Appliance DesignMedicineIn patientpainlcsh:R5-920business.industryBracketAnova testGeneral Medicinelow-friction bracketsBonferroni correctionquality of lifesymbolsoral healthbusinesslcsh:Medicine (General)orthodonticsSoportes ortodóncicos

description

Background and objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of friction on design of the type of bracket, patients’ perception of pain and the impact on their oral health-related quality of life. Materials and Methods: A randomized clinical trial was carried out with 90 patients (62.2% women and 37.8% men) with three kinds of fixed multi-bracket appliances: Conventional (GC), fixed multi-bracket low friction (GS) and self-ligating (GA). The VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) was used to determine pain during the first seven days of treatment at different points in time. The patients were also given the OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile) questionnaire to analyse their oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) after the first 30 days of treatment. The ANOVA test was used for the analysis of the variables and the post hoc Bonferroni test for the comparison between groups. Results: Maximum pain was observed between one and two days after the start of treatment. The GC group showed the greatest degree of pain, with maximum values (4.5 ± 2.0) at 24 h. The self-ligation brackets show lower impact on patients’ oral health-related quality of life (0.8 ± 2.2, p &lt

http://hdl.handle.net/11268/10860