6533b825fe1ef96bd1281fc4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

EEG Data Quality: Determinants and Impact in a Multicenter Study of Children, Adolescents, and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Johannes HebebrandAnna KaiserMichael RöslerJohannes ThomeElena Von WirthKarina AbenovaMichael HussMartin HoltmannChristine M. FreitagHenrik Uebel-von SanderslebenTobias J. RennerBarbara AlmJulia GeisslerKatja BeckerKatja BeckerAlexandra PhilipsenTanja LegenbauerThomas EthoferSabina MillenetLea Teresa JendreizikAndreas J. FallgatterMarcel RomanosToivo ZinnowNathalie E. HolzSarah HohmannJohanna KetterTobias BanaschewskiManfred DöpfnerThomas JansDaniel BrandeisLuise PoustkaPascal-m AggensteinerWolfgang RetzWolfgang Retz

subject

medicine.medical_specialtymedia_common.quotation_subjectMedizin610artifactsElectroencephalographyAudiologyArticle050105 experimental psychologylcsh:RC321-571electroencephalography (EEG); data quality; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); artifacts; multicenter study03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineContinuous performance taskmedicinedata qualityAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesQuality (business)electroencephalography (EEG)ddc:610lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatrymedia_commonCued speechmedicine.diagnostic_testGeneral Neuroscience05 social sciencesattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)ReplicateStepwise regressionmedicine.diseasemulticenter studyData qualityPsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Electroencephalography (EEG) represents a widely established method for assessing altered and typically developing brain function. However, systematic studies on EEG data quality, its correlates, and consequences are scarce. To address this research gap, the current study focused on the percentage of artifact-free segments after standard EEG pre-processing as a data quality index. We analyzed participant-related and methodological influences, and validity by replicating landmark EEG effects. Further, effects of data quality on spectral power analyses beyond participant-related characteristics were explored. EEG data from a multicenter ADHD-cohort (age range 6 to 45 years), and a non-ADHD school-age control group were analyzed (ntotal = 305). Resting-state data during eyes open, and eyes closed conditions, and task-related data during a cued Continuous Performance Task (CPT) were collected. After pre-processing, general linear models, and stepwise regression models were fitted to the data. We found that EEG data quality was strongly related to demographic characteristics, but not to methodological factors. We were able to replicate maturational, task, and ADHD effects reported in the EEG literature, establishing a link with EEG-landmark effects. Furthermore, we showed that poor data quality significantly increases spectral power beyond effects of maturation and symptom severity. Taken together, the current results indicate that with a careful design and systematic quality control, informative large-scale multicenter trials characterizing neurophysiological mechanisms in neurodevelopmental disorders across the lifespan are feasible. Nevertheless, results are restricted to the limitations reported. Future work will clarify predictive value.

https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020214