6533b825fe1ef96bd12827ad

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Erratum to: Cetuximab-induced skin exanthema: prophylactic and reactive skin therapy are equally effective

Martin R. BergerInes GockelMatthias TheobaldJutta HerzogMarkus MöhlerCarl C. SchimanskiPeter R. GalleThomas WehlerClaudine GrafHauke Lang

subject

MaleCancer ResearchColorectal cancerAdministration TopicalAdministration OralCetuximabMinocyclineGastroenterologyPeritoneal NeoplasmPeritoneal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsSkinHematologyintegumentary systemCetuximabTherapy reactiveMultimodal therapyVitamin K 1General MedicineMiddle AgedCombined Modality TherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAppendiceal NeoplasmsOncologyColonic NeoplasmsAdenocarcinomaFemaleErratumQuinolizinesFluoroquinolonesmedicine.drugmedicine.medical_specialtyPrednisoloneEGFRDetergentsAntineoplastic AgentsAdenocarcinomaAntibodies Monoclonal HumanizedDisease-Free SurvivalMetronidazoleRashInternal medicineIntestinal NeoplasmsmedicineCombined Modality TherapyHumansSurvival rateAgedRetrospective StudiesOriginal PaperRectal Neoplasmsbusiness.industryRetrospective cohort studyAntibiotic ProphylaxisExanthemamedicine.diseaseDermatologydigestive system diseasesSurgerybusiness

description

Purpose Treatment with cetuximab is accompanied by the development of an acneiform follicular skin exanthema in more than 80 % of patients. Severe exanthema (grade III/IV) develops in about 9–19 % of patients with the necessity of cetuximab dose reduction or cessation. Methods The study presented was a retrospective analysis of 50 gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with cetuximab in combination with either FOLFIRI or FOLFOX. One cohort of 15 patients received an in-house reactive skin protocol upon development of an exanthema. A second cohort of 15 patients received a skin prophylaxis starting with the first dose of cetuximab before clinical signs of toxicity. A third historic group of 20 patients had received no skin prophylaxis or reactive treatment. Results 19/20 patients of the historic group developed a skin exanthema. Grade III/IV exanthema was observed six times. Forty percent discontinued cetuximab therapy. The average time to exanthema onset was 14.7 days. Applying the reactive skin protocol after the first occurrence of an exanthema, the exanthema was downgraded as follows: No patients developed grade IV° exanthema, and two patients developed a grade II/III exanthema. In the majority of cases, the reactive skin protocol controlled the exanthema (grade 0–I°). No dose reductions in cetuximab were necessary. Applying the prophylactic skin protocol starting at the beginning of cetuximab application was not superior to the reactive skin protocol. Conclusions Cetuximab-induced skin exanthema can be coped with a reactive protocol equally effective as compared to a prophylactic skin treatment. A prospective study with higher patient numbers is planned.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-013-1507-0