6533b825fe1ef96bd12829e2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Work–family conflict and enrichment from the perspective of psychosocial resources: Comparing Finnish healthcare workers by working schedules

Ulla KinnunenSaija MaunoSaija MaunoMervi Ruokolainen

subject

AdultEmploymentMaleScheduleTime FactorsHealth PersonnelJob controlWork–family conflictPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationHuman Factors and ErgonomicsJob SatisfactionConflict PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesWork Schedule ToleranceHealth careHumansPsychologyFamilyfamily conflictSafety Risk Reliability and QualityEngineering (miscellaneous)ta515FinlandWork–family enrichmentbusiness.industryPerspective (graphical)shiftworkta3142Femalefamily enrichmentPsychologybusinessSocial psychologyPsychosocial

description

Abstract We examined work–family conflict (WFC) and work–family enrichment (WFE) by comparing Finnish nurses, working dayshifts (non-shiftworkers, n = 874) and non-dayshifts. The non-dayshift employees worked either two different dayshifts (2-shiftworkers, n = 490) or three different shifts including nightshifts (3-shiftworkers, n = 270). Specifically, we investigated whether different resources, i.e. job control, managers' work–family support, co-workers' work–family support, control at home, personal coping strategies, and schedule satisfaction, predicted differently WFC and WFE in these three groups. Results showed that lower managers' work–family support predicted higher WFC only among 3-shiftworkers, whereas lower co-workers' support associated with increased WFC only in non-shiftworkers. In addition, shiftworkers reported higher WFC than non-shiftworkers. However, the level of WFE did not vary by schedule types. Moreover, the predictors of WFE varied only very little across schedule types. Shiftwork organizations should pay more attention to family–friendly management in order to reduce WFC among shiftworkers.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.11.009