6533b826fe1ef96bd1284827

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire (BCSQ-36): reliability and validity study in Latvia

Marija AbeltinaIeva StokenbergaAleksandrs KolesovsJustine SkudraMalgozata Rascevska

subject

AdultMaleAdolescentPsychometricshealth care facilities manpower and serviceseducationBurnout PsychologicalBurnoutYoung Adult03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineSurveys and Questionnaireshealth services administrationHumans030212 general & internal medicineBurnout ProfessionalApplied PsychologyReliability (statistics)AgedReproducibility of ResultsFactorial validityMiddle AgedLatvia030227 psychiatryTest (assessment)Psychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyCross-Sectional StudiesConvergent validityFemalePsychologypsychological phenomena and processesClinical psychology

description

The study aimed to test the validity of the burnout subtypes hierarchic model operationalized by the 'Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire' (BCSQ-36) and its applicability in other cultures. To that aim psychometric properties, factorial and convergent validity regarding the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS), and correlation with demographic factors were reviewed. A voluntary internet-based approach was used on a multi-occupational sample of adult Latvians (n = 394). The results of the internal consistency of the Latvian version of the BCSQ-36 exceeded .89 for all three subtypes. The CFA was used to test a hierarchical factorial model, and the analysis revealed an acceptable fit of the model to the data. Correlation analysis showed results as expected, similarly to the original sample -

yearjournalcountryeditionlanguage
2020-02-05Psychology, Health & Medicine
https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2019.1710544