6533b826fe1ef96bd1285176
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Differential effects of sex hormones on peri- and endocortical bone surfaces in pubertal girls.
Jussi M. HalleenClaes OhlssonQingju WangHarri SuominenSulin ChengMarkku AlenSari L. AlataloSari L. AlataloPatrick Nicholsonsubject
medicine.medical_specialtyBone densityAdolescentEndocrinology Diabetes and MetabolismClinical BiochemistryLong boneAcid PhosphataseOsteocalcinContext (language use)BiochemistryBone resorptionEndocrinologySex hormone-binding globulinBone DensityInternal medicineSex Hormone-Binding GlobulinmedicineHumansTestosteroneChildGonadal Steroid HormonesBone growthBone mineralMenarcheBone DevelopmentbiologyEstradiolTibiabusiness.industryTartrate-Resistant Acid PhosphataseBiochemistry (medical)PubertyAlkaline PhosphataseIsoenzymesmedicine.anatomical_structureEndocrinologyOsteocalcinbiology.proteinLinear ModelsFemalebusinessBiomarkersdescription
Context: The role of sex steroids in bone growth in pubertal girls is not yet clear. Bone biomarkers are indicators of bone metabolic activity, but their value in predicting bone quality has not been studied in growing girls. Objective: This study examines the association of sex hormones and bone markers with bone geometry and density in pubertal girls. Design: The study was designed as a 2-yr longitudinal study in pubertal girls. Measurements were performed at baseline and at 1and 2-yr follow-ups. Setting: The study was conducted in a university laboratory. Participants: A total of 258 10- to 13-yr-old healthy girls at the baseline participated. Methods:Peripheralquantitativecomputedtomographywasusedto scan the left tibial shaft. Serum 17-estradiol (E2), testosterone (T), SHBG, osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b were assessed. Data were analyzed using hierarchical linear models with random effect. Results: E2 was a positive predictor for total bone mineral density (BMD), cortical thickness, and a negative predictor for endocortical circumference but had no predictive value for total bone crosssectional area or periosteal circumference. T was a positive predictor for total cross-sectional area and periosteal circumference as well as endocortical circumference, and a negative predictor for total BMD. OC was negatively correlated with cortical BMD (R 2 0.325; P 0.001). Conclusions: In pubertal girls, E2 and T have different influences on bone properties at the long bone shaft. The results suggest that, at the endocortical surface, E2 inhibits bone resorption during rapid growth, and later, after menarche, acts at higher concentrations to promote bone formation. At the periosteal surface, T promotes bone formation, whereas E2 does not affect it. In addition, OC might be used as a predictor of cortical BMD. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 277–282, 2006)
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2005-10-27 | The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism |