6533b826fe1ef96bd12851a8
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Clinical and prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in restaging of pancreatic cancer
Federico MidiriDemetrio FamiliariPierpaolo AlongiMaria Concetta FornitoMassimo GaliaRoberta GentileMassimo MidiriMarco MessinaSalvatore ScalisiDomenico AlbanoMassimiliano Spadasubject
AdultMalePrognosioverall survival18F-FDG-PET/CTpancreatic cancer030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging03 medical and health sciencesdisease progression0302 clinical medicineRetrospective StudieFluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPancreatic cancerrestagingHumansMedicineRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingProgression-free survivalRetrospective StudiesAgedNeoplasm StagingReceiver operating characteristicbusiness.industryProportional hazards modelHazard ratioPancreatic NeoplasmArea under the curveRetrospective cohort studyGeneral MedicineMiddle AgedPrognosismedicine.diseaseConfidence intervalPancreatic Neoplasms030220 oncology & carcinogenesisFemalebusinessNuclear medicineprogression-free survivalHumandescription
Aim The aim of this retrospective multicentre study was to evaluate the clinical and prognostic effect of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT) in the restaging process of pancreatic cancer (PC). Materials and methods Data from patients treated for primary PC, who underwent18F-FDG-PET/CT for suspicious of disease progression, were collected. Accuracy was assessed employing conventional diagnostic procedures, multidisciplinary team case notes, further18F-FDG-PET/CT scans and/or follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratio (LR+/-) analyses were used for completion of accuracy definition. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were assessed by using Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of outcome. Results Fifty-two patients (33 males and 19 females, with mean age of 59 years and range: 42-78 years) with PC were finally included in our study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of18F-FDG-PET were 85, 84, 90, 76, and 84%, respectively. Area under the curve was 0.84 (95% confidence intervals: 0.72-0.96; P6 h=4.2, P=0.02) and death (PET positivity hazard ratio=3.5, P=0.02; SUVmax>6 h=3.7, P=0.01). Conclusion18F-FDG-PET/CT showed high diagnostic accuracy for restaging process of PC, proving also its potential value in predicting clinical outcome after primary treatment.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-08-01 | Nuclear Medicine Communications |