6533b827fe1ef96bd1285ad7
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Extended causal modeling to assess Partial Directed Coherence in multiple time series with significant instantaneous interactions.
Giandomenico NolloLuca Faessubject
Multivariate statisticsTime FactorsGeneral Computer ScienceModels NeurologicalPattern Recognition AutomatedCardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaElectrocardiographyGranger causalityArtificial IntelligenceEconometricsCoherence (signal processing)AnimalsHumansComputer SimulationEEGPartial Directed CoherenceMathematicsCausal modelMultivariate autoregressive modelComputer Science (all)Linear modelElectroencephalographySignal Processing Computer-AssistedCardiovascular variabilityAutoregressive modelFrequency domainParametric modelSettore ING-INF/06 - Bioingegneria Elettronica E InformaticaGranger causalityMultivariate time serieLinear ModelsNeural Networks ComputerBiotechnologydescription
The Partial Directed Coherence (PDC) and its generalized formulation (gPDC) are popular tools for investigating, in the frequency domain, the concept of Granger causality among multivariate (MV) time series. PDC and gPDC are formalized in terms of the coefficients of an MV autoregressive (MVAR) model which describes only the lagged effects among the time series and forsakes instantaneous effects. However, instantaneous effects are known to affect linear parametric modeling, and are likely to occur in experimental time series. In this study, we investigate the impact on the assessment of frequency domain causality of excluding instantaneous effects from the model underlying PDC evaluation. Moreover, we propose the utilization of an extended MVAR model including both instantaneous and lagged effects. This model is used to assess PDC either in accordance with the definition of Granger causality when considering only lagged effects (iPDC), or with an extended form of causality, when we consider both instantaneous and lagged effects (ePDC). The approach is first evaluated on three theoretical examples of MVAR processes, which show that the presence of instantaneous correlations may produce misleading profiles of PDC and gPDC, while ePDC and iPDC derived from the extended model provide here a correct interpretation of extended and lagged causality. It is then applied to representative examples of cardiorespiratory and EEG MV time series. They suggest that ePDC and iPDC are better interpretable than PDC and gPDC in terms of the known cardiovascular and neural physiologies. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010-10-12 | Biological cybernetics |