6533b827fe1ef96bd128657e
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Radium-223 treatment in castration resistant bone metastatic prostate cancer. Should be the primary tumor always treated?
Francesco VerderameNicolò BorsellinoMaria LicariA. PrinciottaAlessandra MurabitoVittorio GebbiaChiara SanfilippoVincenzo TripoliRenato CostaVincenzo SerrettaMaria Rosaria ValerioCristina Scalici Gesolfosubject
Radium-223Malemedicine.medical_specialtyUrologymedicine.medical_treatment030232 urology & nephrologyUrologyAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsSettore MED/24 - UrologiaPrimary tumor03 medical and health sciencesProstate cancer0302 clinical medicineProstateRadium-222medicineHumansAgedProstatectomyRadiotherapybusiness.industryProstatectomyProstateChemoradiotherapy Adjuvantmedicine.diseasePrognosisRadical prostatectomyPrimary tumorSurvival AnalysisRadiation therapyProstatic Neoplasms Castration-Resistantmedicine.anatomical_structureTreatment OutcomeOncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisConcomitantDisease ProgressionCastration resistant prostate cancerNeoplasm GradingRadiopharmaceuticalsbusinessmedicine.drugHormoneFollow-Up StudiesRadiumdescription
Introduction: Radium-223 (223Ra) improves symptoms and survival in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Study aim: To evaluate the impact of a previous radical prostatectomy (RP) on the outcome of 223Ra therapy in mCRPC patients. The primary prostate tumor left untreated could progress during 223Ra treatment. Materials and methods: mCRPC symptomatic patients treated with 223Ra were enrolled. Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone analogue was maintained. No other anticancer therapy was given. 223Ra was administered i.v. at the dose of 55 kBq/kg every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients were stratified according to previous RP or not. Hematological toxicity was monitored. Statistical analysis of 223Ra discontinuations, progressions, and deaths were performed. Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled, 16 (36.4%) previously received RP, 5 (11.3%) prostate radiotherapy and 23 (52.3%) maintained the primary prostate tumor after local treatment. All patients presented only bone metastases, 24 patients (54.5%) had more than 20. Twenty-six (59.1%) patients were treated after first or second line systemic chemotherapy. Treatment interruptions occurred in 14 patients (50%) with prostate and in 4 (25%) without (P = 0.04). After a median follow-up of 18 months (6−30 months), 15 (53.6%), and 7 (43.7%) progressions (P = 0.34) and 13 and 1 (6.2%) deaths (P = 0.04) occurred in patients with and without prostate respectively. Conclusion: The presence of the primary prostate tumor seems to play a detrimental role in mCRPC patients undergoing 223Ra treatment in absence of other concomitant anticancer therapy. On the other hand a previous RP might play a protective role. 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-01-04 | Urologic oncology |