6533b827fe1ef96bd1286635
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Patterns of intermediate host use and levels of association between two conflicting manipulative parasites.
Loïc BollacheYannick OutremanStewart J. PlaistowFrank Cézillysubject
0106 biological sciencesMaleCompetitive BehaviorPopulationZoology[SDV.BID]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesAcanthocephalaHost-Parasite Interactions03 medical and health sciencesSex FactorsGammarusCrustaceaAnimalseducationComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS030304 developmental biology[ SDV.BID ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity0303 health scienceseducation.field_of_studybiologyBehavior AnimalEcologyHost (biology)Intermediate hostbiology.organism_classificationPolymorphusGammarus pulexInfectious DiseasesPulexParasitologyPomphorhynchus laevisFranceSeasonsdescription
For many parasites with complex life cycles, manipulation of intermediate host phenotypes is often regarded as an adaptation to increase the probability of successful transmission. This phenomenon creates opportunities for either synergistic or conflicting interests between different parasite species sharing the same intermediate host. When more than one manipulative parasite infect the same intermediate host, but differ in their definitive host, selection should favour the establishment of a negative association between these manipulators. Both Polymorphus minutus and Pomphorhynchus laevis exploit the amphipod Gammarus pulex as intermediate host but differ markedly in their final host, a fish for P. laevis and a bird for P. minutus. The pattern of host use by these two conflicting manipulative parasites was studied. Their incidence and intensity of infection and their distribution among G. pulex were first examined by analysing three large samples of gammarids collected from the river Tille, Eastern France. Both parasites had low prevalence in the host population. However, temporal fluctuation in the level of parasitic infection was observed. Overall, prevalence of both parasite species was higher in male than in female G. pulex. We then assessed the degree of association between the two parasites among their intermediate hosts, using two different methods: a host-centred measure and a parasite-centred measure. Both measures gave similar results; showing random association between the two acanthocephalan species in their intermediate hosts. We discuss our results in relation to the selective forces and ecological constraints that may determine the pattern of association between conflicting manipulative parasites.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2002-02-14 | International journal for parasitology |