6533b827fe1ef96bd128674f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Do phase-dependent life history traits in cyclic voles persist in a common environment?

Marko HaapakoskiJanne SundellHannu Ylönen

subject

0106 biological sciencesPopulation DynamicsPhenotypic plasticitymedicine.disease_cause01 natural sciencesphenotypic plasticityBANK VOLESMaternal effectChitty effectSeasonal breederLife History TraitsOverwintering2. Zero hungereducation.field_of_studyArvicolinaeBank voleReproductionMaternal effectBody sizePOPULATION-CYCLE1181 Ecology evolutionary biologyGROWTHSeasonsmaternal effectympäristötekijätmetsämyyräPopulationZoologyBiologyWINTER FOOD010603 evolutionary biologyLife history theoryHereditymedicineJuvenileAnimalsbank volechitty effecteducationRODENT DYNAMICSEcology Evolution Behavior and SystematicsperinnöllisyysPhenotypic plasticityMICROTUS-AGRESTIS010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyEVOLUTIONPopulation Ecology–Original ResearchDENSITYCommon gardenfenotyyppicommon gardenbody size

description

Phenotype and life history traits of an individual are a product of environmental conditions and the genome. Environment can be current or past, which complicates the distinction between environmental and heritable effects on the phenotype in wild animals. We studied genome–environment interactions on phenotype and life history traits by transplanting bank voles (Myodes glareolus) from northern and southern populations, originating from low or high population cycle phases, to common garden conditions in large outdoor enclosures. The first experiment focused on the persistence of body traits in autumn-captured overwintering populations. The second experiment focused on population growth and body traits in spring-captured founder voles and F1 generation. This experiment lasted the breeding season and subsequent winter. We verified phase-dependent differences in body size at capture. In the common environment, adult voles kept their original body size differences both over winter and during the breeding season. In addition, the first generation born in the common environment kept the size distribution of their parent population. The increase phase population maintained a more rapid growth potential, while populations from the decline phase of the cycle grew slower. After winter, the F1 generation of the increasing northern population matured later than the F1 of the southern declining ones. Our results suggest a strong role of heredity or early life conditions, greater than that of current juvenile and adult environmental conditions. Environmental conditions experienced by the parents in their early life can have inter-generational effects that manifest in offspring performance. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00442-019-04410-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201906193320