6533b827fe1ef96bd1286f50
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Planning and Analysis of Trials Using a Stepped Wedge Design: Part 26 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications
Maria BlettnerJochem KönigStefan WellekPhilipp MildenbergerNorbert Donner-banzhoffsubject
Research designClinical Trials as Topic030505 public healthRandomizationbusiness.industryHealth services researchMEDLINEReview ArticleGeneral Medicine01 natural sciencesClinical trialNormal distribution010104 statistics & probability03 medical and health sciencesResearch DesignIntervention (counseling)StatisticsCluster AnalysisMedicine0101 mathematicsTime point0305 other medical sciencebusinessdescription
Background The stepped-wedge design (SWD) of clinical trials has become very popular in recent years, particularly in health services research. Typically, study participants are randomly allotted in clusters to the different treatment options. Methods The basic principles of the stepped wedge design and related statistical techniques are described here on the basis of pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and in the CIS statistical literature database. Results In a typical SWD trial, the intervention is begun at a time point that varies from cluster to cluster. Until this time point is reached, all participants in the cluster belong to the control arm of the trial. Once the intervention is begun, it is continued with- out change until the end of the trial period. The starting time for the intervention in each cluster is determined by randomization. At the first time point of measurement, no intervention has yet begun in any cluster; at the last one, the intervention is in prog- ress in all clusters. The treatment effect can be optimally assessed under the assumption of an identical correlation at all time points. A method is available to calculate the power and the number of clusters that would be necessary in order to achieve statistical significance by the appropriate type of significance test. All of the statistical techniques presented here are based on the assumptions of a normal distribution of cluster means and of a constant intervention effect across all time points of measure- ment. Conclusion The necessary statistical tools for the planning and evaluation of SWD trials now stand at our disposal. Such trials nevertheless are subject to major risks, as valid results can be obtained only if the far-reaching assumptions of the model are, in fact, justified.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-06-01 | Deutsches Ärzteblatt international |