6533b827fe1ef96bd1287067

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparability of two different polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis methods for the classification of LDL pattern type

Celia BañulsAna JoverVictor M. VictorAntonio Hernández-mijaresAntonio Hernández-mijaresMilagros RochaMilagros RochaLorena BellodMaría L. Martínez-triguero

subject

AdultMaleGel electrophoresisChromatographyTriglyceridemedicine.diagnostic_testBiochemistry (medical)Clinical BiochemistryPolyacrylamideGeneral MedicineMiddle AgedBiochemistryLipoproteins LDLElectrophoresischemistry.chemical_compoundchemistrymedicineHumansElectrophoresis Polyacrylamide GelFemaleParticle sizeParticle SizeLipid profilePolyacrylamide gel electrophoresisLipoprotein

description

Abstract Background The measurement of small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) particles is relevant when assessing cardiovascular risk. However, there is as yet no referenced method for the determination of LDL subfractions or a standardized comparison of the methods currently available. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the pattern of LDL particles measured by polyacrylamide tube gel electrophoresis (PTGE) and polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (PGGE) and to correlate the results with triglyceride concentration. Materials and methods Serum samples were collected from 177 patients. Lipid profile and LDL particle size were assessed using PTGE and PGGE. Results Pearson correlation and kappa index revealed a very good agreement between the methods. There was 81.3% concordance for classification of sdLDL particles and 97.2% concordance for classification of large LDL when PTGE and PGGE were compared. LDL size correlated with triglyceride in subjects with triglyceride levels > 116 mg/dl, pointing to a high CAD risk, as reflected by their higher prevalence of pattern B. Conclusions PTGE correlates favourably and is in very good agreement with PGGE. The determination of LDL particle size may be an appropriate analytical procedure to estimate CAD risk in patients with high triglyceride levels.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2011.09.047