6533b827fe1ef96bd1287115

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Phase I Study of the Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) Inhibitor Navoximod (GDC-0919) Administered with PD-L1 Inhibitor (Atezolizumab) in Advanced Solid Tumors

Kyung Hae JungPatricia LorussoHoward BurrisMichael GordonYung-jue BangMatthew HellmannAndres CervantesMaria Ochoa De OlzaAurélien MarabelleF Stephen HodiMyung-ju AhnLeisha EmensFabrice BarlesiOmid HamidEmiliano CalvoDavid McdermottHatem SolimanIna RheeRay LinTony PourmohamadJulia SuchomelAmy TsuhakoKari MorrisseySami MahrusRoland MorleyAndrea PirzkallS Lindsey DavisF. Stephen HodiS. Lindsey Davis

subject

0301 basic medicineAdultCancer ResearchIndoles[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio][SDV.BC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular BiologyPharmacologyAntibodies Monoclonal HumanizedArticleB7-H1 Antigen03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePharmacokineticsAtezolizumabRenal cell carcinomaNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsmedicineBiomarkers TumorHumansIndoleamine-Pyrrole 23-DioxygenaseNeoplasm MetastasisAgedNeoplasm StagingAged 80 and overBladder cancerbusiness.industryMelanomaImidazolesMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseMagnetic Resonance Imaging3. Good health030104 developmental biologyTreatment OutcomeOncologyTolerability030220 oncology & carcinogenesisPharmacodynamicsPD-L1 inhibitorbusinessTomography X-Ray Computed

description

Abstract Purpose: IDO1 induces immune suppression in T cells through l-tryptophan (Trp) depletion and kynurenine (Kyn) accumulation in the local tumor microenvironment, suppressing effector T cells and hyperactivating regulatory T cells (Treg). Navoximod is an investigational small-molecule inhibitor of IDO1. This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of navoximod in combination with atezolizumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. Patients and Methods: The study consisted of a 3+3 dose-escalation stage (n = 66) and a tumor-specific expansion stage (n = 92). Navoximod was given orally every 12 hours continuously for 21 consecutive days of each cycle with the exception of cycle 1, where navoximod administration started on day −1 to characterize pharmacokinetics. Atezolizumab was administered by intravenous infusion 1,200 mg every 3 weeks on day 1 of each cycle. Results: Patients (n = 157) received navoximod at 6 dose levels (50–1,000 mg) in combination with atezolizumab. The maximum administered dose was 1,000 mg twice daily; the MTD was not reached. Navoximod demonstrated a linear pharmacokinetic profile, and plasma Kyn generally decreased with increasing doses of navoximod. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (22%), rash (22%), and chromaturia (20%). Activity was observed at all dose levels in various tumor types (melanoma, pancreatic, prostate, ovarian, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, cervical, neural sheath, non–small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial bladder cancer): 6 (9%) dose-escalation patients achieved partial response, and 10 (11%) expansion patients achieved partial response or complete response. Conclusions: The combination of navoximod and atezolizumab demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics for patients with advanced cancer. Although activity was observed, there was no clear evidence of benefit from adding navoximod to atezolizumab.

https://www.fundanet.incliva.es/publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=2838