6533b828fe1ef96bd1287b6c

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Quality Control in 3D Printing: Accuracy Analysis of 3D-Printed Models of Patient-Specific Anatomy

Ahmed GhazyOroa SalemRayan ChabanPia Elisabeth BaquéBernhard Dorweiler

subject

3d printedMaterials science3D printing3d modelFDM printing030204 cardiovascular system & hematologylcsh:TechnologyArticle030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaginglaw.invention03 medical and health sciencesDICOM3D engineering0302 clinical medicinelawStl fileGeneral Materials Sciencelcsh:Microscopycoronarylcsh:QC120-168.85anatomical modellcsh:QH201-278.5Fused deposition modelingaccuracyPolyJet printinglcsh:Tbusiness.industryAnatomy3D printingPatient specificaortalcsh:TA1-2040lcsh:Descriptive and experimental mechanicslcsh:Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringlcsh:Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)Wall thicknessbusinesslcsh:TK1-9971

description

As comparative data on the precision of 3D-printed anatomical models are sparse, the aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3D-printed models of vascular anatomy generated by two commonly used printing technologies. Thirty-five 3D models of large (aortic, wall thickness of 2 mm, n = 30) and small (coronary, wall thickness of 1.25 mm, n = 5) vessels printed with fused deposition modeling (FDM) (rigid, n = 20) and PolyJet (flexible, n = 15) technology were subjected to high-resolution CT scans. From the resulting DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) dataset, an STL file was generated and wall thickness as well as surface congruency were compared with the original STL file using dedicated 3D engineering software. The mean wall thickness for the large-scale aortic models was 2.11 µm (+5%), and 1.26 µm (+0.8%) for the coronary models, resulting in an overall mean wall thickness of +5% for all 35 3D models when compared to the original STL file. The mean surface deviation was found to be +120 µm for all models, with +100 µm for the aortic and +180 µm for the coronary 3D models, respectively. Both printing technologies were found to conform with the currently set standards of accuracy (&lt

10.3390/ma14041021http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14041021