6533b828fe1ef96bd12885b3
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Surgical treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally advanced flaps with or without subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Ricardo Bellver-fernándezMiguel PeñarrochaRaul-guillermo CaffesseAna-maría Martínez-rodriguezClaudio Gioia-palavecinosubject
0301 basic medicineAdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyTest groupOral Surgical ProceduresDentistrySubepithelial connective tissue graftOdontologíaSurgical Flaps03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinemedicineHumansGingival RecessionSurgical FlapsSurgical treatmentGeneral DentistryGingival recessionRetrospective Studiesbusiness.industryResearchGingival attachment030206 dentistryMiddle Aged:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Root coverageCiencias de la saludeye diseasesSurgery030104 developmental biologyOtorhinolaryngologyConnective TissueUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASSurgeryFemalemedicine.symptomOral Surgerybusinesshuman activitiesdescription
Background A coronally advanced flap with subepithelial connective tissue graft is the gold standard surgical treatment of gingival recessions, since it offers a higher probability of achieving complete root coverage compared with other techniques. However, optimum short- and middle-term clinical results have also been obtained with coronally advanced flaps alone. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the results obtained by the surgical treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally advanced flaps with or without subepithelial connective tissue graft. Material and Methods The reduction of recession height was assessed, together with the gain in gingival attachment apical to the recession, and total reduction of recession, in a comparative study of two techniques. Twenty-two gingival recessions were operated upon: 13 in the control group (coronally advanced flap) and 9 in the test group (coronally advanced flap associated to subepithelial connective tissue graft). Results After 18 months, the mean reduction of recession height was 2.2 ± 0.8 mm in the control group and 2.3 ± 0.7 mm in the test group, with a mean gain in gingival attachment of 1.3 ± 0.9 mm and 2.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively. In percentage terms, the mean reduction of recession height was 84.6 ± 19.6% in the control group and 81.7 ± 17.8% in the test group, with a mean gain in gingival attachment of 20.5 ± 37.4% and 184.4 ± 135.5%, respectively. Conclusions Significant reduction of gingival recession was achieved with both techniques, though the mean gain in gingival attachment (in mm and as a %) was greater in test group. Key words:Gingival recession, coronally advanced flap, subepthelial connective tissue graft.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015-09-09 | Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal |