6533b828fe1ef96bd1288f30

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Neuromuscular Differences Between Endurance-Trained, Power-Trained, and Sedentary Subjects

Guillaume Y. MilletRomuald LepersNicolas BabaultG. LattierNicola A. Maffiuletti

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyKnee Joint[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]Neuromuscular JunctionPhysical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationIsometric exercisePlantar flexionVertical jumpSquat jumpIsometric ContractionInternal medicine[SDV.MHEP.PHY]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Tissues and Organs [q-bio.TO]medicineHumansOrthopedics and Sports MedicineMaximal rateTwitch forcecomputer.programming_languageAnalysis of VariancePhysical Education and TrainingKnee extensorsElectromyographyFootbusiness.industrysedGeneral Medicinemusculoskeletal systemElectric Stimulationbody regionsCross-Sectional StudiesCardiologybusinesscomputer

description

This study tested the hypothesis that neuromuscular characteristics of plantar flexor (PF) and knee extensor (KE) muscles explain differences of both performance in vertical jump and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) between endurance-trained (END, n = 9), power-trained (POW, n = 8), and sedentary subjects (SED, n = 8). Evoked twitch characteristics of PF and KE were measured. MVC, maximal voluntary activation (%VA) of KE, and performance in vertical jump were also measured. POW have higher maximal rate of twitch force development (MRFD) than SED and END for both PF (p < 0.05) and KE (p < 0.01); %VA and MVC were higher for POW and END than SED (p < 0.01). Higher performances were measured in vertical jump for POW compared with END and SED. Significant relationships were found between the squat jump performance and MRFD for both KE and PF (R = 0.71, p < 0.0001 and R = 0.55, p < 0.01, respectively). These findings show that low MRFD on lower limbs extensors does not limit expression of MVC on subjects with high levels of activation, whereas intrinsic muscular qualities have a direct influence on performance during the vertical jump.

https://doi.org/10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0514:ndbepa>2.0.co;2