6533b828fe1ef96bd1288f63
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Applying a Dynamic Performance Management Framework to Wicked Issues: How Coproduction Helps to Transform Young People's Services in Surrey County Council, UK
Tony BovairdCarmine BianchiElke Loefflersubject
Process managementPublic AdministrationPerformance managementmedia_common.quotation_subjectcoproductionPublic administrationOutcome (game theory)Conformityservice qualitypublic governanceQuality of life (healthcare)Settore SECS-P/07 - Economia Aziendale0502 economics and business050602 political science & public administrationEconomicsBusiness and International Managementservice transformationmedia_commonService qualityDynamic performance managementCorporate governanceDynamic performance management; coproduction; service transformation; service quality; public governance05 social sciences0506 political scienceco-productionIntervention (law)Coproduction050203 business & managementdescription
This article explores how a dynamic performance management (DPM) approach can give policy makers a more integrated, time-related understanding of how to address wicked problems successfully. The article highlights how an outcome-based approach to solving wicked policy problems has to balance three very contrasting objectives of stakeholders in the policy making process-improving service quality, improving quality of life outcomes and improving conformity to the principles of public governance. Simultaneous achievement of these three objectives may not be feasible, as they may form an interactive dynamic system. However the balancing act between them may be achieved by the use of DPM. Policy insights from this novel approach are illustrated through a case study of a highly successful co-production intervention to help young people with multiple disadvantages in Surrey, UK. The implications of DPM are that policy development needs to accept the important roles of emergent strategy and learning mechanisms, rather than attempting 'blueprint' strategic planning and control mechanisms. Some expectations about the results may indeed be justifiable in particular policy systems, as clustering of quality of life outcomes and outcomes in the achievement of governance principles is likely, because behaviours are strongly inter-related. However, this clustering can never be taken for granted but must be tested in each specific policy context. Undertaking simulations with the model and recalibrating it through time, as experience builds up, may allow learning in relation to overcoming barriers to achieving outcomes in the system.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-02-23 |