6533b828fe1ef96bd1288fc0

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Minimal coupling in presence of non-metricity and torsion

Adrià Delhom

subject

Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)FOS: Physical scienceslcsh:AstrophysicsGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)Space (mathematics)Computer Science::Digital Libraries01 natural sciencesGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmologysymbols.namesakelcsh:QB460-4660103 physical scienceslcsh:Nuclear and particle physics. Atomic energy. RadioactivityCovariant transformation010306 general physicsEngineering (miscellaneous)Mathematical PhysicsSpin-½Mathematical physicsMinimal couplingPhysics010308 nuclear & particles physicsCharge (physics)Mathematical Physics (math-ph)Action (physics)Connection (mathematics)Computer Science::Mathematical Softwaresymbolslcsh:QC770-798Noether's theorem

description

We deal with the question of what it means to define a minimal coupling prescription in presence of torsion and/or non-metricity, carefully explaining while the naive substitution $\partial\to\na$ introduces extra couplings between the matter fields and the connection that can be regarded as non-minimal in presence of torsion and/or non-metricity. We will also investigate whether minimal coupling prescriptions at the level of the action (MCPL) or at the level of field equations (MCPF) lead to different dynamics. To that end, we will first write the Euler-Lagrange equations for matter fields in terms of the covariant derivatives of a general non-Riemannian space, and derivate the form of the associated Noether currents and charges. Then we will see that if the minimal coupling prescriptions is applied as we discuss, for spin 0 and 1 fields the results of MCPL and MCPF are equivalent, while for spin 1/2 fields there is a difference if one applies the MCPF or the MCPL, since the former leads to charge violation.

10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8330-yhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02404