6533b829fe1ef96bd128a44a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Carotenoid binding sites in LHCIIb

Hildrun NiemeierStephan HobeHarald PaulsenAlexander Bender

subject

ChlorophyllLuteinPhotosynthetic Reaction Center Complex ProteinsPigment bindingLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesXanthophyllsBiologyBinding CompetitiveBiochemistrySubstrate SpecificityLight-harvesting complexchemistry.chemical_compoundNeoxanthinZeaxanthinsTrypsinProtein PrecursorsCarotenoidPlant Proteinschemistry.chemical_classificationBinding SitesChlorophyll ALuteinPhotosystem II Protein Complexfood and beveragesPigments BiologicalPlantsbeta CaroteneCarotenoidseye diseasesZeaxanthinEnergy TransferchemistryBiochemistryXanthophyllElectrophoresis Polyacrylamide GelApoproteinsViolaxanthin

description

The major light-harvesting complex of photosystem II can be reconstituted in vitro from its bacterially expressed apoprotein with chlorophylls a and b and neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, or zeaxanthin as the only xanthophyll. Reconstitution of these one-carotenoid complexes requires low-stringency conditions during complex formation and isolation. Neoxanthin complexes (containing 30–50% of the all-trans isomer) disintegrate during electrophoresis, exhibit a largely reduced resistance against proteolytic attack; in addition, energy transfer from Chl b to Chl a is easily disrupted at elevated temperature. Complexes reconstituted in the presence of either zeaxanthin or lutein contain nearly two xanthophylls per 12 chlorophylls and are more resistant against trypsin. Lutein–LHCIIb also exhibits an intermediate maintenance of energy transfer at higher temperature. Violaxanthin complexes approach a xanthophyll/12 chlorophyll ratio of 3, similar to the ratio in recombinant LHCIIb containing all xanthophylls. On the other hand, violaxanthin–LHCIIb exhibits a low thermal stability like neoxanthin complexes, but an intermediate accessibility towards trypsin, similar to lutein–LHCIIb and zeaxanthin–LHCIIb. Binary competition experiments were performed with two xanthophylls at varying ratios in the reconstitution. Analysis of the xanthophyll contents in the reconstitution products yielded information about relative carotenoid affinities of three assumed binding sites. In lutein/neoxanthin competition experiments, two binding sites showed a strong preference (> 200-fold) for lutein, whereas the third binding site had a higher affinity (25-fold) to neoxanthin. Competition between lutein and violaxanthin gave a similar result, although the specificities were lower: two binding sites have a 36-fold preference for lutein and one has a fivefold preference for violaxanthin. The lowest selectivity was between lutein and zeaxanthin: two binding sites had a fivefold higher affinity for lutein and one has a threefold higher affinity to zeaxanthin.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01060.x