6533b829fe1ef96bd128adfe

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The Impact of the Mass Spectrum of Lenses in Quasar Microlensing Studies. Constraints on a Mixed Population of Primordial Black Holes and Stars

J. A. MuñozJ. Jiménez-vicenteN. Agües-paszkowskyEvencio MediavillaS. HeydenreichA. Esteban-gutiérrez

subject

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciencesAstrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical PhenomenaPopulationFOS: Physical sciencesPrimordial black holeAstrophysicsAstrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic AstrophysicsGravitational microlensing01 natural sciencesEinstein radius0103 physical scienceseducation010303 astronomy & astrophysicsAstrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics0105 earth and related environmental sciencesPhysicseducation.field_of_studyComputer Science::Information RetrievalAstronomy and AstrophysicsQuasarAstrophysics - Astrophysics of GalaxiesStarsSpace and Planetary ScienceAstrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)Mass spectrumAstrophysics::Earth and Planetary AstrophysicsGeometric meanAstrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

description

We show that quasar microlensing magnification statistics induced by a population of point microlenses distributed according to a mass-spectrum can be very well approximated by that of a single-mass, "monochromatic", population. When the spatial resolution (physically defined by the source size) is small as compared with the Einstein radius, the mass of the monochromatic population matches the geometric mean of the mass-spectrum. Otherwise, the best-fit mass can be larger. Taking into account the degeneracy with the geometric mean, the interpretation of quasar microlensing observations under the hypothesis of a mixed population of primordial black holes and stars, makes the existence of a significant population of intermediate mass black holes ($\sim$ 100$M_\odot$) unlikely but allows, within a two-$\sigma$ confidence interval, the presence of a large population ($\gtrsim 40\%$ of the total mass) of substellar black holes ($\sim$ 0.01$M_\odot$).

10.3847/1538-4357/abbdf7http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.05751