6533b829fe1ef96bd128ae4a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Body dimensions of the extinct giant shark Otodus megalodon: a 2D reconstruction

Humberto G. FerrónMichael J. BentonCatalina PimientoCatalina PimientoCatalina PimientoJack A. Cooper

subject

0301 basic medicineIsurusfood.ingredientLamna nasusZoologylcsh:MedicineMegalodonPaleontologia10125 Paleontological Institute and MuseumArticleOtodontidae03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinefoodImage Processing Computer-AssistedAnimalsBody Size14. Life underwaterlcsh:ScienceSwimmingLamniformesAllometry1000 MultidisciplinaryMultidisciplinaryMegalodonbiologymorphometricsPalaeontologybody dimensionslcsh:ROtodusbiology.organism_classificationLamnaCarcharodon030104 developmental biology560 Fossils & prehistoric lifeSharksLamniformeslcsh:QIchthyology030217 neurology & neurosurgeryOtodontidae

description

AbstractInferring the size of extinct animals is fraught with danger, especially when they were much larger than their modern relatives. Such extrapolations are particularly risky when allometry is present. The extinct giant shark †Otodus megalodon is known almost exclusively from fossilised teeth. Estimates of †O. megalodon body size have been made from its teeth, using the great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) as the only modern analogue. This can be problematic as the two species likely belong to different families, and the position of the †Otodus lineage within Lamniformes is unclear. Here, we infer †O. megalodon body dimensions based on anatomical measurements of five ecologically and physiologically similar extant lamniforms: Carcharodon carcharias, Isurus oxyrinchus, Isurus paucus, Lamna ditropis and Lamna nasus. We first assessed for allometry in all analogues using linear regressions and geometric morphometric analyses. Finding no evidence of allometry, we made morphological extrapolations to infer body dimensions of †O. megalodon at different sizes. Our results suggest that a 16 m †O. megalodon likely had a head ~ 4.65 m long, a dorsal fin ~ 1.62 m tall and a tail ~ 3.85 m high. Morphometric analyses further suggest that its dorsal and caudal fins were adapted for swift predatory locomotion and long-swimming periods.

10.5167/uzh-190657https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/190657/