6533b829fe1ef96bd128af82

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners' preferences in boreal mire protection.

Panu HalmeJanne S. KotiahoEini NieminenSanttu Kareksela

subject

Value (ethics)Conservation of Natural ResourcesNatural resource economicsGeography Planning and DevelopmentVoluntary conservationBiodiversitysoidensuojeluContext (language use)voluntary conservationtaloudelliset vaikutuksetsuojelualueetzonationSystematic conservation planningEconomic costMireZonationEnvironmental ChemistryHumansconservation policyyksityismaattrade-off analysisEcosystemEcologyResistance (ecology)Conservation policyTrade offsympäristöpolitiikkaGeneral MedicineBiodiversitymaanomistusPrivate land protectionprivate land protectionPolicyBorealAttitudeCosts and Cost AnalysisTrade-off analysissosiaalinen kestävyysBusinessluonnonsuojelusystematic conservation planningResearch Article

description

Private land often encompasses biodiversity features of high conservation value, but its protection is not straightforward. Commonly, landowners’ perspectives are rightfully allowed to influence conservation actions. This unlikely comes without consequences on biodiversity or other aspects such as economic considerations, but these consequences are rarely quantitatively considered in decision-making. In the context of boreal mire protection in Finland, we report how acknowledging landowners’ resistance to protection changes the combination of mires selected to conservation compared to ignoring landowners’ opinions. Using spatial prioritization, we quantify trade-offs arising between the amount of landowners’ resistance, protected biodiversity, and financial costs in different conservation scenarios. Results show that the trade-offs cannot be fully avoided. Nevertheless, we show that the systematic examination of the trade-offs opens up options to alleviate them. This can promote the evaluation of different conservation policy outcomes, enabling better-informed conservation decisions and more effective and socially sustainable allocation of conservation resources. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13280-021-01530-0.

10.1007/s13280-021-01530-0https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33825157