6533b82afe1ef96bd128b79c
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Managing boreal forests for the simultaneous production of collectable goods and timber revenues
María TriviñoMikko MönkkönenDmitry PodkopaevArtti JuutinenAdriano MazziottaMaiju Peurasubject
0106 biological sciences010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciencestimbersienestysForest managementforest managementnontimber forest productoptimal forest managements010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesmetsätalousmarjanpoimintaoptimointimushroomProduction (economics)Revenuelcsh:Forestrywildberry0105 earth and related environmental sciencesbusiness.industryAgroforestrymonikäyttöEcological ModelingTaigaTrade offsForestryta4112multifunctional forestrymetsätpuuntuotantotrade-offsekosysteemipalvelutmetsätulotCollectablemetsänkasvatusta1181lcsh:SD1-669.5Businessmetsänhoitoecosystem servicesecosystemsoptimizationdescription
Timber Production is an economically important provisioning ecosystem service in forests, but is often in conflict with the provision of other ecosystem services. In multifunctional forestry, the production of timber and non-timber ecosystem services should coexist in the same landscape. To this end, we explored the capacity of a boreal landscape to simultaneously produce collectable goods − bilberry (Vaccimium myrtillus L.), cowberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) and cep (Boletus edulis Bull.) − alongside timber revenues. We also identified optimal forest management plans to achieve this. Furthermore, we analyzed trade-offs between collectable good yields and timber production, as well as between their economic values. We ran forest growth simulations under seven alternative management regimes at a landscape level across 50-year planning horizons. Then, we used multi-objective optimization to explore trade-offs and identify optimal forest management plans. The results showed that the strongest trade-off was between bilberry and timber production, resulting in a large loss in timber revenues for a gain in bilberry production. However, the conflicts between other collectables and timber production were relatively small: It was possible to increase the provision of collectable goods 4–15% with small reductions (3−5%) from timber revenues. With careful forest planning, there is the potential to simultaneously produce high levels of collectable goods and timber revenues in the landscape. peerReviewed
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-10-01 |