6533b82afe1ef96bd128c330
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Automatic and controlled processing of acoustic and phonetic contrasts
Jaana HalmetojaRisto NäätänenPaavo AlkuElyse SussmanTeija KujalaHeikki Lyytinensubject
AdultMaleAdolescentmedia_common.quotation_subjectSpeech recognitionMismatch negativity050105 experimental psychologySpeech Acoustics03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineEvent-related potentialVowelPerceptionP3botorhinolaryngologic diseasesHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesAttentionmedia_commonAnalysis of Variance05 social sciencesInformation processingBrainElectroencephalographySpeech processingSensory SystemsAcoustic StimulationDuration (music)Evoked Potentials AuditorySpeech PerceptionFemalesense organsPsychologypsychological phenomena and processes030217 neurology & neurosurgerydescription
Changes in the temporal properties of the speech signal provide important cues for phoneme identification. An impairment or inability to detect such changes may adversely affect one's ability to understand spoken speech. The difference in meaning between the Finnish words tuli (fire) and tuuli (wind), for example, lies in the difference between the duration of the vowel /u/. Detecting changes in the temporal properties of the speech signal, therefore, is critical for distinguishing between phonemes and identifying words. In the current study, we tested whether detection of changes in speech sounds, in native Finnish speakers, would vary as a function of the position within the word that the informational changes occurred (beginning, middle, or end) by evaluating how length contrasts in segments of three-syllable Finnish pseudo-words and their acoustic correlates were discriminated. We recorded a combination of cortical components of event-related brain potentials (MMN, N2b, P3b) along with behavioral measures of the perception of the same sounds. It was found that speech sounds were not processed differently than non-speech sounds in the early stages of auditory processing indexed by MMN. Differences occurred only in later stages associated with controlled processes. The effects of position and attention on speech and non-speech stimuli are discussed.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2003-10-04 |