6533b82afe1ef96bd128c375

RESEARCH PRODUCT

A multicenter, randomized, blinded, phase III study of pasireotide LAR versus octreotide LAR in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) with disease-related symptoms inadequately controlled by somatostatin analogs.

Janice L. PasiekaBarbara JarzabDavid R. FogelmanMarc WeberMichael A. MorseWasat MansoorThomas WalterJerry M. HuangAbakar MahamatJohn RamagePaola TomassettiEdward M. WolinXin ZhiJohn Newell-priceKjell ÖBergBarbro ErikssonDonald PoonFredrik SwahnMichelle HudsonChristos Toumpanakis

subject

Cancer Researchmedicine.medical_specialtybusiness.industryOctreotideDiseaseNeuroendocrine tumorsmedicine.diseaseLanreotideOctreotide larGastroenterologyPasireotidechemistry.chemical_compoundSomatostatinEndocrinologyOncologychemistryInternal medicineMedicineIn patientbusinessmedicine.drug

description

4031 Background: The novel somatostatin analog (SSA) pasireotide has a broader binding profile than currently available SSA (octreotide and lanreotide). Results from a phase III study (NCT00690430) of pasireotide LAR (P) vs octreotide LAR (O) in patients (pts) with NET and disease-related symptoms uncontrolled by the maximum approved dose of available SSA are shown. Methods: Pts (N=110) were randomized and stratified by predominant symptom at baseline (diarrhea [D], flushing [F], or D+F) 1:1 to P (60 mg IM) or O (40 mg IM) q28d. Primary objective was symptom response at month (M) 6. Secondary objectives included tumor response and safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) was an exploratory analysis. Results: 53 and 57 pts were enrolled in the P and O arms when the study was halted due to an interim analysis suggesting futility for symptom response. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. Majority of primary tumor locations were small intestine (72% and 81% in the P and O arms). Symptom response at M6 was 9/43 (21%) and 12/45 (27%) in the P and O arms, odds ratio 0.73 (95% CI, 0.27-1.97; p=0.53). Median numbers of D/day and F/2 weeks and change in symptom from baseline to M6 are in Table. Hyperglycemia (11% vs 0%), diarrhea (9% vs 7%), and abdominal pain (2% vs 9%) were the most common grade 3/4 AEs in the P vs O arms in the core phase, and 7 (13%) and 4 (7%) pts discontinued due to AEs. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 11.8 months and 6.8 months in the P and O arms (HR=0.46; p=0.045). Conclusions: P and O showed a similar safety profile except for the higher frequency of hyperglycemia in P. Pts on P had PFS 5 months longer than pts on O (investigator assessment), despite no differences in symptom response rates. These results warrant a large phase III trial to clarify the role of P as a therapy for NET. Clinical trial information: NCT00690430. [Table: see text]

https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4031