6533b82afe1ef96bd128cb18

RESEARCH PRODUCT

External training load and the effects on training response following three different training sessions in young elite beach volleyball players

Marcus SchmidtMark PfeifferThiemo PelzerThomas Jaitner

subject

Rating of perceived exertionmedicine.medical_specialtyTraining (meteorology)030229 sport sciencesmedicine.disease_cause03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineJumpingPhysical medicine and rehabilitationDelayed onset muscle sorenessInternal responsemedicineJump030212 general & internal medicineTraining loadmedicine.symptomPsychologySocial Sciences (miscellaneous)

description

Purpose The interaction between external training load (ETL) and players internal response in beach volleyball is currently poor investigated. Using single parameters (e.g. jump volume) described in indoor settings is questionable due to specific load characteristics like sandy ground and reduced number of players. The aim of this work is to analyze ETL and the effects on training response in different beach volleyball training settings. Methods This study was conducted with 7 youth elite athletes (age: 18.9 ± 1.3 years, height: 185.2 ± 7 cm, body mass: 75.9 ± 10.4 kg, 2 males/5 females). Training sessions were classified into three categories with (A) high session jump volume (SJV) and lower proportions of other action types like diving, reception, defense actions and setting, (B) moderate SJV and (C) low SJV and higher proportions of other action types. Delayed Onset of Muscle Soreness [DOMS], Creatinkinase [CK] and session rate of perceived exertion [s-RPE] were analyzed as training response markers. Results Mean pre to post differences in CMJ-Height were highest at sessions with high jump volume and less other actions (Session A) with no significant differences between (C) to (B) ( p = .128), (C) to (A) ( p = .237) and (B) to (A) ( p = .101). Response markers (DOMS, s-RPE, CK) showed increased values at session type C. Conclusions SJV does not seem to trigger training response with higher marker responsiveness during low frequency sessions. Changes in directions, diving or fast getting up might rather provoke fatigue during training.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954120940488