6533b82bfe1ef96bd128e114

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Delivery of epirubicin via slow infusion as a strategy to mitigate chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity

Qiao LeiRunxiang YangLu LiSai Ching J. YeungFang YangJian Chang HeChunxiang LuoJiajia Zeng

subject

MalePhysiologyCancer Treatmentlcsh:Medicine030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyPharmacologyBiochemistryRats Sprague-DawleyMice0302 clinical medicineBolus (medicine)Intraperitoneal InjectionsBreast TumorsMedicine and Health Scienceslcsh:Scienceskin and connective tissue diseasesInfusions IntravenousRoutes of AdministrationMultidisciplinaryAntibiotics AntineoplasticArea under the curveHeartAnimal ModelsBody FluidsBloodExperimental Organism SystemsOncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisAnatomyEpirubicinmedicine.drugResearch ArticleAnthracyclineMouse ModelsResearch and Analysis MethodsBlood Plasma03 medical and health sciencesModel OrganismsPharmacokineticsIn vivoCell Line TumorBreast CancermedicineAnimalsDoxorubicinPharmacokineticsAnimal Models of DiseaseEpirubicinPharmacologyCardiotoxicitybusiness.industrylcsh:RCancers and NeoplasmsBiology and Life SciencesRatsAnimal Studieslcsh:QbusinessBiomarkers

description

Background Continuous infusion of doxorubicin has been a strategy to reduce cardiotoxicity. Epirubicin is another anthracycline in common clinical use. However, evidence is lacking regarding whether this strategy can reduce cardiotoxicity of epirubicin without compromising antineoplastic efficacy. Design and methods Healthy rats were randomized into groups: epirubicin (8 mg/kg) delivered intraperitoneally via micro osmotic pumps (MOP), epirubicin (8 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal (IP) bolus injection, and placebo control. Blood samples were collected for analyzing biomarkers of myocardial injury and pharmacokinetics. At chosen times, sub-groups of animals were sacrificed for histopathology. A mouse breast cancer cell line (4T1), stably transfected with luciferase, was orthotopically allografted in female mice, and treated in three groups as described above for the rats. Tumor growth was monitored by measuring tumor size as well as bioluminescence. Results Delivery by IP bolus and by MOP achieved essentially the same area under the curve of epirubicin plasma concentration time profile. Blood biomarkers showed that the degree of myocardial injury in MOP group was lower than that of IP group. Histopathology showed that there was less eosinophilic enhancement, interstitial hemorrhage and necrotizing muscle atrophy in MOP group than IP group. In the orthotopic breast cancer allograft mouse model, the antineoplastic effect of epirubicin by MOP was not different from that by IP as measured by tumor weights or by in vivo bioluminescence. Conclusion Slow delivery of epirubicin by MOP reduced cardiotoxicity without compromising the antineoplastic effect compared to IP bolus delivery. These in vivo data support our previous clinical data that continuous intravenous infusion of epirubicin using micro infusion pumps over 48–96 hours had less cardiotoxicity than intravenous bolus injections. However, whether multiple doses of epirubicin given by MOP result in a lower magnitude of long term cardiomyopathy remains to be further investigated.

10.1371/journal.pone.0188025http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5683617