6533b82bfe1ef96bd128e153

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Radiation exposure in biliary procedures performed to manage anastomotic strictures in pediatric liver transplant recipients: comparison between radiation exposure levels using an image intensifier and a flat-panel detector-based system.

Luigi MaruzzelliAngelo LucaFabio TuzzolinoPietro Luigi IndovinaRoberto Miraglia

subject

Malemedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentmedicine.medical_treatmentConstriction PathologicAnastomosisPercutaneous transhepatic cholangiographyRadiation DosageRadiography InterventionalPediatricsFlat panel detectorlaw.inventionCatheterizationCholangiographyArteriovenous Shunt SurgicallawmedicineFluoroscopyHumansRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingChildPediatric Liver Transplantmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryUltrasoundImage intensifierRadiation ExposureLiver TransplantationRadiation exposureRadiographic Image EnhancementChild PreschoolFluoroscopyFemaleRadiologyCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinebusinessAngioplasty BalloonCholangiography

description

The aim of this study was to estimate radiation exposure in pediatric liver transplants recipients who underwent biliary interventional procedures and to compare radiation exposure levels between biliary interventional procedures performed using an image intensifier-based angiographic system (IIDS) and a flat panel detector-based interventional system (FPDS). We enrolled 34 consecutive pediatric liver transplant recipients with biliary strictures between January 2008 and March 2013 with a total of 170 image-guided procedures. The dose-area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time was recorded for each procedure. The mean age was 61 months (range 4–192), and mean weight was 17 kg (range 4–41). The procedures were classified into three categories: percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary catheter placement (n = 40); cholangiography and balloon dilatation (n = 55); and cholangiography and biliary catheter change or removal (n = 75). Ninety-two procedures were performed using an IIDS. Seventy-eight procedures performed after July 2010 were performed using an FPDS. The difference in DAP between the two angiographic systems was compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and a multiple linear regression model. Mean DAP in the three categories was significantly greater in the group of procedures performed using the IIDS compared with those performed using the FPDS. Statistical analysis showed a p value = 0.001 for the PTBD group, p = 0.0002 for the cholangiogram and balloon dilatation group, and p = 0.00001 for the group with cholangiogram and biliary catheter change or removal. In our selected cohort of patients, the use of an FPDS decreases radiation exposure.

10.1007/s00270-013-0660-9https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23765127