6533b82bfe1ef96bd128e383

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Development of the Angioedema Control Test—A patient‐reported outcome measure that assesses disease control in patients with recurrent angioedema

Torsten ZuberbierDenise FreierMarcus MaurerFrank SiebenhaarKaroline KrauseMartin MetzTamara DonosoEmel Aygören-pürsünPetra StaubachSabine AltrichterKarsten WellerInmaculada Martinez-saguerMarkus MagerlTomasz Hawro

subject

0301 basic medicinemedicine.medical_specialtyImmunologyValidityContext (language use)Bradykinin03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinemedicineContent validityHumansImmunology and AllergyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAngioedemaRetrospective StudiesRecallAngioedemabusiness.industryReproducibility of Resultsmedicine.diseaseDisease control030104 developmental biology030228 respiratory systemHereditary angioedemaPhysical therapyPatient-reported outcomemedicine.symptombusiness

description

Background Recurrent angioedema (AE) is an important clinical problem in the context of chronic urticaria (mast cell mediator-induced), ACE-inhibitor intake and hereditary angioedema (both bradykinin-mediated). To help patients obtain control of their recurrent AE is a major treatment goal. However, a tool to assess control of recurrent AE is not yet available. This prompted us to develop such a tool, the Angioedema Control Test (AECT). Methods After a conceptional framework was developed for the AECT, a list of potential AECT items was generated by a combined approach of patient interviews, literature review and expert input. Subsequent item reduction was based on impact analysis, inter-item correlation, additional predefined criteria for item performance, and a review of the item selection process for content validity. Finally, an instruction section was generated, and an US-American-English version was developed by a structured translation process. Results A 4-item AECT with recall periods of 4 weeks and 3 months was developed based on 106 potential items tested in 97 patients with mast cell mediator-induced (n = 49) or bradykinin-mediated recurrent AE (n = 48). Eighty-four items were excluded based on impact analysis. The remaining 22 items could be further reduced by a method-mix of inter-item correlation, additional predefined criteria for item performance and review for content validity. Conclusions The AECT is the first tool to assess disease control in recurrent AE patients. Its retrospective approach, its brevity and its simple scoring make the AECT ideally suited for clinical practice and trials. Its validity and reliability need to be determined in future independent studies.

https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14144